These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33200183)

  • 1. Are women satisfied with their experience with breast cancer screening? Systematic review of the literature.
    Pagliarin F; Pylkkanen L; Salakari M; Deandrea S
    Eur J Public Health; 2021 Feb; 31(1):206-214. PubMed ID: 33200183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of an instrument assessing women's satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program.
    Bairati I; Turcotte S; Doray G; Belleau F; Grégoire L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Jan; 14():9. PubMed ID: 24397342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Satisfaction in the National Cancer Screening Program for breast cancer with and without clinical breast examination.
    Han MA; Jun JK; Choi KS; Park EC; Lee HY
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 22502715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Satisfaction with mammography in the National Cancer Screening Programme participants of age 40s in Korea.
    Jeon BY; Lee HY; Park EC; Choi KS; Jun JK; Kim Y; Han MA; Yoon NH; Kim EJ; Jeon SM
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2011 Nov; 20(6):803-9. PubMed ID: 20649810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validated tools measuring women's satisfaction in breast cancer screening programmes: A systematic review.
    Deandrea S; Salakari M; Neamţiu L; Ulutürk A; Lerda D; Pylkkänen L
    Breast; 2018 Jun; 39():33-38. PubMed ID: 29533883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control in a National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: women's satisfaction with the mammography process.
    Almog R; Hagoel L; Tamir A; Barnett O; Rennert G
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18319148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participants' satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening programs: A systematic review.
    Selva A; Mosconi G; Cacitti S; Odone A; Pylkkanen L; Solà I; Torà N; Russo S; Cadum E; Deandrea S
    Prev Med; 2023 Oct; 175():107706. PubMed ID: 37722458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies enhancing the patient experience in mammography: A scoping review.
    Ding S; Fontaine T; Serex M; Sá Dos Reis C
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):340-352. PubMed ID: 38141428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Satisfaction, discomfort, obligations, and concerns in population-based breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study in a Danish population.
    Gabel P; Larsen MB; Nielsen PB; Svendstrup DB; Andersen B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):489. PubMed ID: 28709436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast screening for survivors of breast cancer: A systematic review.
    Muradali D; Kennedy EB; Eisen A; Holloway CMB; Smith CR; Chiarelli AM
    Prev Med; 2017 Oct; 103():70-75. PubMed ID: 28765083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.
    DuBenske LL; Schrager SB; Hitchcock ME; Kane AK; Little TA; McDowell HE; Burnside ES
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1805-1814. PubMed ID: 30030738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening.
    Bakker DA; Lightfoot NE; Steggles S; Jackson C
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1998; 25(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 9460779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Noble M; Bruening W; Uhl S; Schoelles K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):881-90. PubMed ID: 19023581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's satisfaction with mammography and predictors of participation in an organized breast cancer screening program: Perspectives of a Local Health Unit in Rome.
    Unim B; Boggi R; Napoli M; Fulgenzi R; Landi A; La Torre G
    Public Health; 2018 Feb; 155():91-94. PubMed ID: 29331770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Patient satisfaction of women involved in the pilot program of large scale mammography in the Ariana area of Tunisia].
    Zeghal D; Mahjoub S; Zakraoui MA; Ben Aissa R; Zaanouni E; Lazaar I; Mbarek F; Ouechtati A; Zouari F; Boussen H; Gueddana N
    Tunis Med; 2009 Jul; 87(7):480-3. PubMed ID: 20063684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.