These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33200183)

  • 21. Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening.
    Mandrik O; Tolma E; Zielonke N; Meheus F; Ordóñez-Reyes C; Severens JL; Murillo R
    J Med Screen; 2021 Jun; 28(2):70-79. PubMed ID: 32517538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hwong A; Wang K; Bent S; Mangurian C
    Psychiatr Serv; 2020 Mar; 71(3):263-268. PubMed ID: 31722645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Damiani G; Basso D; Acampora A; Bianchi CB; Silvestrini G; Frisicale EM; Sassi F; Ricciardi W
    Prev Med; 2015 Dec; 81():281-9. PubMed ID: 26408405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of organized breast cancer screening on mammography use: Evidence from France.
    Buchmueller TC; Goldzahl L
    Health Econ; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1963-1980. PubMed ID: 30084221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "It's much easier than going to the dentist": high levels of satisfaction in a mammography screening program.
    Brotherton J; Taylor R; Ivanov O; Tewson R; Page A
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2007 Aug; 31(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 17725016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.
    Gartlehner G; Thaler KJ; Chapman A; Kaminski A; Berzaczy D; Van Noord MG; Helbich TH
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2013 Jun; 11(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23750571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    US Preventive Services Task Force
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trends in the use of mammography for early breast cancer detection in Switzerland: Swiss Health Surveys 2007 and 2012.
    Fenner L; Kässner A; Berlin C; Egger M; Zwahlen M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14603. PubMed ID: 29756635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Barriers to Organized Mammography Screening Programs in Hungary: A Questionnaire-based Study of 3,313 Women.
    Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Bak M; Kásler M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Mar; 38(3):1727-1734. PubMed ID: 29491109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Barriers to screening mammography.
    Sarma EA
    Health Psychol Rev; 2015; 9(1):42-62. PubMed ID: 25793490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
    Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction of participants at breast screening programmes.
    Cockburn J; Hill D; Irwig L; De Luise T; Turnbull D; Schofield P
    Eur J Cancer; 1991; 27(7):827-31. PubMed ID: 1834111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors Influencing Overuse of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
    Sharma R; Pannikottu J; Xu Y; Tung M; Nothelle S; Oakes AH; Segal JB
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Sep; 27(9):1142-1151. PubMed ID: 29708809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast cancer worry in further examination of mammography screening--a systematic review.
    Metsälä E; Pajukari A; Aro AR
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2012 Dec; 26(4):773-86. PubMed ID: 22168467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigating young women's motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional study.
    Labrie NH; Ludolph R; Schulz PJ
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Mar; 17(1):209. PubMed ID: 28327090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Satisfaction with the breast cancer screening program in Barcelona: a comparison between 2006 and 2016.].
    Puigpinós-Riera R; Serral G
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2021 Jan; 95():. PubMed ID: 33496276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Warner E; Messersmith H; Causer P; Eisen A; Shumak R; Plewes D
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 May; 148(9):671-9. PubMed ID: 18458280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(20):1-30. PubMed ID: 27990198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. "I'm Just Guessing These Answers!" An Evaluation of the (In)Accuracy of Patient-Reported Medical History Collected as Part of a Breast Imaging Program.
    Chung S; Rosewall T; Menezes R; Kalliomäki T
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2018 Dec; 49(4):390-396. PubMed ID: 30514556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.