222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33200590)
1. Comparison of Continuous ECG Monitoring by Wearable Patch Device and Conventional Telemonitoring Device.
Choi W; Kim SH; Lee W; Kang SH; Yoon CH; Youn TJ; Chae IH
J Korean Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 35(44):e363. PubMed ID: 33200590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality.
Steinberg C; Philippon F; Sanchez M; Fortier-Poisson P; O'Hara G; Molin F; Sarrazin JF; Nault I; Blier L; Roy K; Plourde B; Champagne J
Biosensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30669678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Adhesive Single-Lead ECG Device Compared with Holter Monitoring among Non-Atrial Fibrillation Patients.
Kwon S; Lee SR; Choi EK; Ahn HJ; Song HS; Lee YS; Oh S
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33946269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study.
Kwon S; Lee SR; Choi EK; Ahn HJ; Song HS; Lee YS; Oh S; Lip GYH
J Med Internet Res; 2022 May; 24(5):e37970. PubMed ID: 35532989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dry textile electrode for ambulatory monitoring after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A pilot study of simultaneous comparison to the Holter electrocardiogram.
Machino T; Aonuma K; Komatsu Y; Yamasaki H; Igarashi M; Nogami A; Ieda M
F1000Res; 2022; 11():97. PubMed ID: 35860478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison Between a Single-Lead ECG Garment Device and a Holter Monitor: A Signal Quality Assessment.
Neri L; Corazza I; Oberdier MT; Lago J; Gallelli I; Cicero AFG; Diemberger I; Orro A; Beker A; Paolocci N; Halperin HR; Borghi C
J Med Syst; 2024 May; 48(1):57. PubMed ID: 38801649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality of ECG data acquisition, and diagnostic performance of a novel adhesive patch for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring in arrhythmia detection.
Karaoğuz MR; Yurtseven E; Aslan G; Deliormanlı BG; Adıgüzel Ö; Gönen M; Li KM; Yılmaz EN
J Electrocardiol; 2019; 54():28-35. PubMed ID: 30851474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Value of a Wearable Continuous Electrocardiogram Monitoring Device (AT-Patch) for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in High-Risk Patients: Prospective Cohort Study.
Kwun JS; Lee JH; Park BE; Park JS; Kim HJ; Kim SH; Jeon KH; Cho HW; Kang SH; Lee W; Youn TJ; Chae IH; Yoon CH
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e45760. PubMed ID: 37721791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Wearable Electrocardiogram Telemonitoring System for Atrial Fibrillation Detection.
Shao M; Zhou Z; Bin G; Bai Y; Wu S
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 31979184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of a novel wearable electrode embedded in an undershirt for electrocardiogram monitoring and detection of arrhythmias.
Amami K; Yoshihisa A; Horikoshi Y; Yamada S; Nehashi T; Hijioka N; Nodera M; Kaneshiro T; Yokokawa T; Misaka T; Takeishi Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273541. PubMed ID: 35998187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of current ECG consumer electronics (pros and cons).
Hilbel T; Frey N
J Electrocardiol; 2023; 77():23-28. PubMed ID: 36566580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intermittent vs continuous electrocardiogram event recording for detection of atrial fibrillation-Compliance and ease of use in an ambulatory elderly population.
Fredriksson T; Kemp Gudmundsdottir K; Frykman V; Friberg L; Al-Khalili F; Engdahl J; Svennberg E
Clin Cardiol; 2020 Apr; 43(4):355-362. PubMed ID: 31917467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current Use and Future Needs of Noninvasive Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring.
Ikeda T
Intern Med; 2021 Jan; 60(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 32788529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Remote and wearable ECG devices with diagnostic abilities in adults: A state-of-the-science scoping review.
Bouzid Z; Al-Zaiti SS; Bond R; Sejdić E
Heart Rhythm; 2022 Jul; 19(7):1192-1201. PubMed ID: 35276320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation and validation of real-time algorithms for atrial fibrillation detection on a wearable ECG device.
Marsili IA; Biasiolli L; Masè M; Adami A; Andrighetti AO; Ravelli F; Nollo G
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Jan; 116():103540. PubMed ID: 31751811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-purpose ECG telemetry system.
Marouf M; Vukomanovic G; Saranovac L; Bozic M
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jun; 16(1):80. PubMed ID: 28629374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anytime ECG Monitoring through the Use of a Low-Cost, User-Friendly, Wearable Device.
Randazzo V; Ferretti J; Pasero E
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Novel Telemonitoring System Using the Single-lead Electrocardiogram Patch With Conventional Telemetry System.
Kwon S; Choi EK; Lee SR; Oh S; Song HS; Lee YS; Han SJ; Lim HE
Korean Circ J; 2024 Mar; 54(3):140-153. PubMed ID: 38506104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring.
Cheung CC; Kerr CR; Krahn AD
Future Cardiol; 2014 May; 10(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 24976467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a Home-Based Wearable Continuous ECG Monitoring Patch on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: The mSToPS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Steinhubl SR; Waalen J; Edwards AM; Ariniello LM; Mehta RR; Ebner GS; Carter C; Baca-Motes K; Felicione E; Sarich T; Topol EJ
JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(2):146-155. PubMed ID: 29998336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
