These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33201048)

  • 1. Investigating the Influences of Task Demand and Reward on Cardiac Pre-Ejection Period Reactivity During a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Plain B; Richter M; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Bhuiyan T; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):718-731. PubMed ID: 33201048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social observation increases the cardiovascular response of hearing-impaired listeners during a speech reception task.
    Plain B; Pielage H; Richter M; Bhuiyan TA; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 410():108334. PubMed ID: 34450568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
    Rudner M; Lunner T; Behrens T; Thorén ES; Rönnberg J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):577-89. PubMed ID: 22967733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance.
    Pielage H; Zekveld AA; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1577-1589. PubMed ID: 33795615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of monetary reward on listening effort and sentence recognition.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108255. PubMed ID: 33964552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Zhang X; Perkins J; Eilers E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):660-670. PubMed ID: 27438866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
    Gilbert JL; Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise.
    Krueger M; Schulte M; Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Meis M; Brand T; Holube I
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):378-392. PubMed ID: 29049622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.
    Perreau AE; Wu YH; Tatge B; Irwin D; Corts D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):685-697. PubMed ID: 28906240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.