These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33201104)

  • 1. Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety: Automatic Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Deep Learning.
    Mascagni P; Vardazaryan A; Alapatt D; Urade T; Emre T; Fiorillo C; Pessaux P; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Costamagna G; Dallemagne B; Padoy N
    Ann Surg; 2022 May; 275(5):955-961. PubMed ID: 33201104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Kawamura M; Endo Y; Fujinaga A; Orimoto H; Amano S; Kawasaki T; Kawano Y; Masuda T; Hirashita T; Kimura M; Ejima A; Matsunobu Y; Shinozuka K; Tokuyasu T; Inomata M
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8755-8763. PubMed ID: 37567981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using U-Net with Auto-Encoder.
    Alkhamaiseh KN; Grantner JL; Shebrain S; Abdel-Qader I
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7358-7369. PubMed ID: 37491657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety.
    Mascagni P; Fiorillo C; Urade T; Emre T; Yu T; Wakabayashi T; Felli E; Perretta S; Swanstrom L; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Pessaux P; Costamagna G; Padoy N; Dallemagne B
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2709-2714. PubMed ID: 31583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Mascagni P; Alapatt D; Laracca GG; Guerriero L; Spota A; Fiorillo C; Vardazaryan A; Quero G; Alfieri S; Baldari L; Cassinotti E; Boni L; Cuccurullo D; Costamagna G; Dallemagne B; Padoy N
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8379-8386. PubMed ID: 35171336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety (LC-CVS): a multi-national validation study of an objective, procedure-specific assessment using video-based assessment (VBA).
    Adrales G; Ardito F; Chowbey P; Morales-Conde S; Ferreres AR; Hensman C; Martin D; Matthaei H; Ramshaw B; Roberts JK; Schrem H; Sharma A; Tabiri S; Vibert E; Woods MS
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):922-930. PubMed ID: 37891369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Computer Vision Platform to Automatically Locate Critical Events in Surgical Videos: Documenting Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Mascagni P; Alapatt D; Urade T; Vardazaryan A; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Costamagna G; Dallemagne B; Padoy N
    Ann Surg; 2021 Jul; 274(1):e93-e95. PubMed ID: 33417329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis.
    Cheng K; You J; Wu S; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Guan J; Peng B; Wang X
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3160-3168. PubMed ID: 34231066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an artificial intelligence system using deep learning to indicate anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Tokuyasu T; Iwashita Y; Matsunobu Y; Kamiyama T; Ishikake M; Sakaguchi S; Ebe K; Tada K; Endo Y; Etoh T; Nakashima M; Inomata M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1651-1658. PubMed ID: 32306111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Situating Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Focus on Disease Severity.
    Korndorffer JR; Hawn MT; Spain DA; Knowlton LM; Azagury DE; Nassar AK; Lau JN; Arnow KD; Trickey AW; Pugh CM
    Ann Surg; 2020 Sep; 272(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 33759839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cut or Do Not Cut? Assessing Perceptions of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Surgical Videos.
    Carr BD; Matusko N; Sandhu G; Varban OA
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1583-1588. PubMed ID: 29929815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical quality assessment of critical view of safety in 283 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos by surgical residents and surgeons.
    Grüter AAJ; Daams F; Bonjer HJ; van Duijvendijk P; Tuynman JB;
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jul; 38(7):3609-3614. PubMed ID: 38769182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Video Evaluation Study of Whether the Critical View of Safety was Reached.
    Nijssen MA; Schreinemakers JM; Meyer Z; van der Schelling GP; Crolla RM; Rijken AM
    World J Surg; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1798-803. PubMed ID: 25711485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial Intelligence for Intraoperative Guidance: Using Semantic Segmentation to Identify Surgical Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Madani A; Namazi B; Altieri MS; Hashimoto DA; Rivera AM; Pucher PH; Navarrete-Welton A; Sankaranarayanan G; Brunt LM; Okrainec A; Alseidi A
    Ann Surg; 2022 Aug; 276(2):363-369. PubMed ID: 33196488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SurgSmart: an artificial intelligent system for quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an observational study.
    Wu S; Chen Z; Liu R; Li A; Cao Y; Wei A; Liu Q; Liu J; Wang Y; Jiang J; Ying Z; An J; Peng B; Wang X;
    Int J Surg; 2023 May; 109(5):1105-1114. PubMed ID: 37039533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center.
    Chen CB; Palazzo F; Doane SM; Winter JM; Lavu H; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL; Yeo CJ; Pucci MJ
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1627-1635. PubMed ID: 27495348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How often do surgeons obtain the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
    Stefanidis D; Chintalapudi N; Anderson-Montoya B; Oommen B; Tobben D; Pimentel M
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):142-146. PubMed ID: 27142437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Deal SB; Stefanidis D; Telem D; Fanelli RD; McDonald M; Ujiki M; Michael Brunt L; Alseidi AA
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5094-5100. PubMed ID: 28444497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multi-national, video-based qualitative study to refine training guidelines for assigning an "unsafe" score in laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety.
    Adrales G; Ardito F; Chowbey P; Morales-Conde S; Ferreres AR; Hensman C; Martin D; Matthaei H; Ramshaw B; Roberts JK; Schrem H; Sharma A; Tabiri S; Vibert E; Woods MS
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):983-991. PubMed ID: 37973638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the effect of the critical view of safety criteria on simulated operative decision-making: a pilot study.
    Niemann AC; Matusko N; Sandhu G; Varban OA
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):911-916. PubMed ID: 30167948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.