These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33201265)

  • 21. COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology.
    Dekkers OM; Vandenbroucke JP; Cevallos M; Renehan AG; Altman DG; Egger M
    PLoS Med; 2019 Feb; 16(2):e1002742. PubMed ID: 30789892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2004; 4(7):1-98. PubMed ID: 23074457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Issues for covariance analysis of dichotomous and ordered categorical data from randomized clinical trials and non-parametric strategies for addressing them.
    Koch GG; Tangen CM; Jung JW; Amara IA
    Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1863-92. PubMed ID: 9749453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design.
    Meaney C; Moineddin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24461057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science.
    Hopkins WG; Marshall SW; Batterham AM; Hanin J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jan; 41(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19092709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Page MJ; Altman DG; McKenzie JE; Shamseer L; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():7-18. PubMed ID: 29203419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hershey Medical Center Technical Workshop Report: optimizing the design and interpretation of epidemiologic studies for assessing neurodevelopmental effects from in utero chemical exposure.
    Amler RW; Barone S; Belger A; Berlin CM; Cox C; Frank H; Goodman M; Harry J; Hooper SR; Ladda R; LaKind JS; Lipkin PH; Lipsitt LP; Lorber MN; Myers G; Mason AM; Needham LL; Sonawane B; Wachs TD; Yager JW
    Neurotoxicology; 2006 Sep; 27(5):861-74. PubMed ID: 16889835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach.
    Olvera Astivia OL; Gadermann A; Guhn M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 31072299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Strategies in adjusting for multiple comparisons: A primer for pediatric surgeons.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    J Pediatr Surg; 2020 Sep; 55(9):1699-1705. PubMed ID: 32029234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurement error and outcome distributions: Methodological issues in regression analyses of behavioral coding data.
    Holsclaw T; Hallgren KA; Steyvers M; Smyth P; Atkins DC
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2015 Dec; 29(4):1031-40. PubMed ID: 26098126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of the Fieller-Hinkley distribution of the ratio of random variables in testing for noninferiority.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 17365219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: an introduction.
    Shadish WR
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 24606971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test of association: which one is the most appropriate for my study?
    Gonzalez-Chica DA; Bastos JL; Duquia RP; Bonamigo RR; Martínez-Mesa J
    An Bras Dermatol; 2015; 90(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 26375222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
    Imberger G; Vejlby AD; Hansen SB; Møller AM; Wetterslev J
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28422. PubMed ID: 22164288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.