170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33201406)
1. Dynamic assessment of human sperm DNA damage III: the effect of sperm freezing techniques.
Tvrdá E; Gosálvez J; Arroyo F; Sánchez P; de Jesús Risco Delgado R; Sánchez R
Cell Tissue Bank; 2021 Sep; 22(3):379-387. PubMed ID: 33201406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved cryopreservation of spermatozoa using vitrification: comparison of cryoprotectants and a novel device for long-term storage.
O'Neill HC; Nikoloska M; Ho H; Doshi A; Maalouf W
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Aug; 36(8):1713-1720. PubMed ID: 31273587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vitrification and conventional freezing methods in sperm cryopreservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li YX; Zhou L; Lv MQ; Ge P; Liu YC; Zhou DX
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():84-92. PubMed ID: 30580229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method for native human sperm.
Aizpurua J; Medrano L; Enciso M; Sarasa J; Romero A; Fernández MA; Gómez-Torres MJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 28938751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification versus conventional rapid freezing: Effects on motility, viability, morphology and cellular defects.
Le MT; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen TT; Nguyen VT; Nguyen TTA; Nguyen VQH; Cao NT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():14-20. PubMed ID: 30640121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vapour fast freezing with low semen volumes can highly improve motility and viability or DNA quality of cryopreserved human spermatozoa.
Arciero V; Ammar O; Maggi M; Vignozzi L; Muratori M; Dabizzi S
Andrology; 2022 Sep; 10(6):1123-1133. PubMed ID: 35712876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification.
Rosato MP; Iaffaldano N
Theriogenology; 2013 Feb; 79(3):508-16. PubMed ID: 23218394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vitrification is not superior to rapid freezing of normozoospermic spermatozoa: effects on sperm parameters, DNA fragmentation and hyaluronan binding.
Agha-Rahimi A; Khalili MA; Nabi A; Ashourzadeh S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 24444814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Slow Freezing and Vitrification of Human Semen on Post-Thaw Semen Quality and miRNA Expression.
Podgrajsek R; Bolha L; Pungert T; Pizem J; Jazbec K; Malicev E; Stimpfel M
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Apr; 25(8):. PubMed ID: 38673743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cryopreservation of Low Number of Human Spermatozoa; Which is Better: Vapor Phase or Direct Submerging in Liquid Nitrogen?
Hosseini A; Khalili MA; Talebi AR; Agha-Rahimi A; Ghasemi-Esmailabad S; Woodward B; Yari N
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2019 Jun; 22(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 29749276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic assessment of human sperm DNA damage II: the effect of sperm concentration adjustment during processing.
Tvrdá E; Arroyo F; Ďuračka M; López-Fernández C; Gosálvez J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Apr; 36(4):799-807. PubMed ID: 30805848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large volume cryoprotectant-free vitrification: an alternative to conventional cryopreservation for human spermatozoa.
Slabbert M; du Plessis SS; Huyser C
Andrologia; 2015 Jun; 47(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 25040423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strategies to Minimize Various Stress-Related Freeze-Thaw Damages During Conventional Cryopreservation of Mammalian Spermatozoa.
Kumar A; Prasad JK; Srivastava N; Ghosh SK
Biopreserv Biobank; 2019 Dec; 17(6):603-612. PubMed ID: 31429586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of chilled storage and cryopreservation on the sperm DNA fragmentation dynamics of a captive population of koalas.
Johnston SD; Zee YP; López-Fernández C; Gosálvez J
J Androl; 2012; 33(5):1007-15. PubMed ID: 22282436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cryopreservation effects on canine sperm morphometric variables and ultrastructure: Comparison between vitrification and conventional freezing.
Cerdeira J; Sánchez-Calabuig MJ; Pérez-Gutiérrez JF; Hijon M; Castaño C; Santiago-Moreno J
Cryobiology; 2020 Aug; 95():164-170. PubMed ID: 32229272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Freezing, Vitrification, and Freeze-Drying of Equine Spermatozoa: Impact on Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, Lipid Peroxidation, and DNA Integrity.
Restrepo G; Varela E; Duque JE; Gómez JE; Rojas M
J Equine Vet Sci; 2019 Jan; 72():8-15. PubMed ID: 30929788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis between slow freezing and ultra-rapid freezing for human sperm cryopreservation.
Riva NS; Ruhlmann C; Iaizzo RS; Marcial López CA; Martínez AG
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Nov; 22(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 30132630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human sperm vitrification: A scientific report.
Schulz M; Risopatrón J; Uribe P; Isachenko E; Isachenko V; Sánchez R
Andrology; 2020 Nov; 8(6):1642-1650. PubMed ID: 32598551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeated vitrification/warming of human sperm gives better results than repeated slow programmable freezing.
Vutyavanich T; Lattiwongsakorn W; Piromlertamorn W; Samchimchom S
Asian J Androl; 2012 Nov; 14(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 23064685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vitrification induces critical subcellular damages in ram spermatozoa.
Arando A; Delgado JV; Arrebola FA; León JM; Alcalá CJ; Pérez-Marín CC
Cryobiology; 2019 Apr; 87():52-59. PubMed ID: 30826334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
