These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33201411)

  • 1. Three-year performance of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class II primary molar restorations.
    Dermata A; Papageorgiou SN; Kotsanos N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2021 Jun; 22(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 33201411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial.
    Dermata A; Papageorgiou SN; Fragkou S; Kotsanos N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(6):393-401. PubMed ID: 30324561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year clinical performance in primary teeth of nano-filled versus conventional resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Abo-Hamar SE; El-Desouky SS; Abu Hamila NA
    Quintessence Int; 2015 May; 46(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 25642461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer serving both as indirect pulp therapy and as restorative material for primary molars.
    Kotsanos N; Arizos S
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jun; 12(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 21640064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled clinical trial of glass carbomer restorations in Class II cavities in primary molars: 12-month results.
    El-Housseiny AA; Alamoudi NM; Nouri S; Felemban O
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(7):522-532. PubMed ID: 31134226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year evaluation of class II resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite open sandwich and composite restorations.
    Vilkinis V; Hörsted-Bindslev P; Baelum V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 11000317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Santiago SL; Passos VF; Vieira AH; Navarro MF; Lauris JR; Franco EB
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21203706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.
    Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 18491670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occlusal wear of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement following three surface treatments.
    Wu CH; Smales RJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 11355095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Gonçalves DFM; Shinohara MS; Carvalho PRMA; Ramos FSES; Oliveira LC; Omoto ÉM; Fagundes TC
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 29():e20210192. PubMed ID: 34705986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
    Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical efficacy of the conventional glass ionomer cement and resin modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
    Mufti AS
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(4):587-90. PubMed ID: 25672194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.