BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

768 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33203367)

  • 1. Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study.
    Dougan C; Gotha L; Melamed N; Aviram A; Asztalos EV; Anabusi S; Willan AR; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):702. PubMed ID: 33203367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study.
    Aviram A; Lipworth H; Asztalos EV; Mei-Dan E; Melamed N; Cao X; Zaltz A; Hvidman L; Barrett JFR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):916.e1-916.e9. PubMed ID: 32592694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for women in spontaneous labor with a twin pregnancy: A secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
    Mei-Dan E; Dougan C; Melamed N; Asztalos EV; Aviram A; Willan AR; Barrett JFR
    Birth; 2019 Mar; 46(1):193-200. PubMed ID: 30073688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.
    Schmitz T; Carnavalet Cde C; Azria E; Lopez E; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 18310373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The worst of both worlds-combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study.
    Aviram A; Lipworth H; Asztalos EV; Mei-Dan E; Cao X; Melamed N; Zaltz A; Anastasio HB; Berghella V; Barrett JFR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):353.e1-353.e7. PubMed ID: 31254526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kabiri D; Masarwy R; Schachter-Safrai N; Masarwa R; Hirsh Raccah B; Ezra Y; Matok I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 30465748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association Between Planned Cesarean Delivery and Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Twin Pregnancies.
    Schmitz T; Prunet C; Azria E; Bohec C; Bongain A; Chabanier P; D'Ercole C; Deruelle P; De Tayrac R; Dreyfus M; Dupont C; Gondry J; Graesslin O; Kayem G; Langer B; Marpeau L; Morel O; Parant O; Perrotin F; Pierre F; Poulain P; Riethmuller D; Rozenberg P; Rudigoz RC; Sagot P; Sénat MV; Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Venditelli F; Verspyck E; Winer N; Lecomte-Raclet L; Ancel PY; Goffinet F;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):986-995. PubMed ID: 28486364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study.
    Mei-Dan E; Asztalos EV; Willan AR; Barrett JF
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 28061767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mild neonatal morbidity in twins by planned mode of delivery: a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
    Anabusi S; Aviram A; Melamed N; Asztalos E; Naeh A; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100973. PubMed ID: 37061042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?
    Drassinower D; Timofeev J; Huang CC; Landy HJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):160.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24534184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.
    Barrett JF; Hannah ME; Hutton EK; Willan AR; Allen AC; Armson BA; Gafni A; Joseph KS; Mason D; Ohlsson A; Ross S; Sanchez JJ; Asztalos EV;
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Oct; 369(14):1295-305. PubMed ID: 24088091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trial of Labor Compared With Cesarean Delivery in Superobese Women.
    Grasch JL; Thompson JL; Newton JM; Zhai AW; Osmundson SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 29016512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Please exit safely: maternal and twin pair neonatal outcomes according to delivery mode when twin A is vertex
    Hartley RS; Hitti J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 26940591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of Labor versus Cesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies.
    Zafman KB; Rebarber A; Melka S; Naqvi M; Fox NS
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Nov; 37(13):1324-1334. PubMed ID: 31344713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors of unsuccessful vaginal twin delivery.
    Ylilehto E; Palomäki O; Huhtala H; Uotila J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1504-1510. PubMed ID: 32415979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planned Cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twins: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial.
    Zafarmand MH; Goossens SMTA; Tajik P; Bossuyt PMM; Asztalos EV; Gardener GJ; Willan AR; Roumen FJME; Mol BW; Barrett YJ;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 57(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 31674091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.