These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33205270)

  • 1. Modelling of arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution using film theory combined Spiegler-Kedem model: pilot-scale study.
    Rajendran RM; Garg S; Bajpai S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13886-13899. PubMed ID: 33205270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of nanofiltration for the rejection of nickel ions from aqueous solutions and estimation of membrane transport parameters.
    Murthy ZV; Chaudhari LB
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Dec; 160(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 18400379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of landfill leachates by nanofiltration.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1209-17. PubMed ID: 20149518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separation of Cd and Ni from multicomponent aqueous solutions by nanofiltration and characterization of membrane using IT model.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Aug; 180(1-3):309-15. PubMed ID: 20452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of transmembrane pressure and feed concentration on the retention of arsenic, chromium and cadmium from water by nanofiltration.
    Babaee Y; Mousavi SM; Danesh S; Baratian A
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2010 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21114097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of Spiegler⁻Kedem and Steric Hindrance Pore Models for Analyzing Nanofiltration Membrane Performance for Smart Water Production.
    Nair RR; Protasova E; Strand S; Bilstad T
    Membranes (Basel); 2018 Sep; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30200672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental study of arsenic removal by direct contact membrane distillation.
    Qu D; Wang J; Hou D; Luan Z; Fan B; Zhao C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Apr; 163(2-3):874-9. PubMed ID: 18783884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of Flux and Rejection Coefficients in the Removal of Emerging Pollutants Using a Nanofiltration Membrane.
    Hidalgo AM; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; León G; Alfaro I
    Membranes (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 37999354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of atenolol from single and binary aqueous solutions by thin film composite nanofiltration membrane: Transport modeling and pore radius estimation.
    Taheri E; Hadi S; Amin MM; Ebrahimi A; Fatehizadeh A; Aminabhavi TM
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 271():111005. PubMed ID: 32778290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Separation of Drugs by Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes and Their Modelling.
    Nayak V; Cuhorka J; Mikulášek P
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
    Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes to the salty and polluted surface water.
    Koyuncu I; Yazgan M
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2001; 36(7):1321-33. PubMed ID: 11545356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Achieving low concentrations of chromium in drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane performance and selection.
    Giagnorio M; Ruffino B; Grinic D; Steffenino S; Meucci L; Zanetti MC; Tiraferri A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25294-25305. PubMed ID: 29946838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
    Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal.
    Sato Y; Kang M; Kamei T; Magara Y
    Water Res; 2002 Jul; 36(13):3371-7. PubMed ID: 12188137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
    Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of solute-solute interactions and cake enhanced concentration polarization during removal of pharmaceuticals from urban wastewater by nanofiltration.
    Azaïs A; Mendret J; Petit E; Brosillon S
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():156-167. PubMed ID: 27522026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hexavalent Chromium Removal from Model Water and Car Shock Absorber Factory Effluent by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membrane.
    Mnif A; Bejaoui I; Mouelhi M; Hamrouni B
    Int J Anal Chem; 2017; 2017():7415708. PubMed ID: 28819360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.