203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33206227)
1. MRI-induced artifact by a cochlear implant with a novel magnet system: an experimental cadaver study.
Canzi P; Aprile F; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Magnetto M; Lafe E; Minervini D; Avato I; Terrani S; Scribante A; Gazibegovic D; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3753-3762. PubMed ID: 33206227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system.
Canzi P; Magnetto M; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Aprile F; Lafe E; Carlotto E; Avato I; Scribante A; Preda L; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):2889-2898. PubMed ID: 34370074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.
Wagner F; Wimmer W; Leidolt L; Vischer M; Weder S; Wiest R; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio MD
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132483. PubMed ID: 26200775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image Quality and Artifact Reduction of a Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Magnets.
Winchester A; Kay-Rivest E; Bruno M; Hagiwara M; Moonis G; Jethanamest D
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e223-e229. PubMed ID: 36806625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size.
Cass ND; Honce JM; O'Dell AL; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):883-891. PubMed ID: 31219967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size.
Todt I; Guerkov R; Gehl HB; Sudhoff H
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5086291. PubMed ID: 32420348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact Associated With Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants: Cholesteatoma and Vestibular Schwannoma Surveillance.
Nassiri AM; Messina SA; Benson JC; Lane JI; McGee KP; Trzasko JD; Carlson ML
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):187-194. PubMed ID: 37582349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging.
Berry JM; Tansey JB; Wu L; Choudhri A; Yawn RJ; MacDonald CB; Richard C
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 38260952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 3 T In Vivo.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Wagner J; Mutze S; Ernst A
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):972-6. PubMed ID: 25634466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The usefulness of the O-MAR algorithm in MRI skull base assessment to manage cochlear implant-related artifacts.
Canzi P; Carlotto E; Simoncelli A; Lafe E; Scribante A; Minervini D; Nardo M; Malpede S; Chiapparini L; Benazzo M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2023 Aug; 43(4):273-282. PubMed ID: 37488991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artifacts caused by cochlear implants with non-removable magnets in 3T MRI: phantom and cadaveric studies.
Majdani O; Rau TS; Götz F; Zimmerling M; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Labadie R; Leinung M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 266(12):1885-90. PubMed ID: 19629509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Head Position and Magnetic Resonance Sequence on Cochlear Implant-Related Artifact Size and Internal Auditory Canal Visibility.
Kalmanson OA; Talmage GD; Honce JM; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):e73-e80. PubMed ID: 36624593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of a Novel 3T MRI Compatible Cochlear Implant Magnet: Torque, Forces, Demagnetization, and Imaging.
Tysome JR; Tam YC; Patterson I; Graves MJ; Gazibegovic D
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Dec; 40(10):e966-e974. PubMed ID: 31524762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterizing Cochlear Implant Magnet-Related MRI Artifact.
Cass ND; Totten DJ; Ross JD; O'Malley MR
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2023 Mar; 132(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 35382589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of MRI in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with and without retained magnet.
Walker B; Norton S; Phillips G; Christianson E; Horn D; Ou H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 109():44-49. PubMed ID: 29728183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study.
Rupp R; Balk M; Sievert M; Leibl V; Schleder S; Allner M; Iro H; Hoppe U; Hornung J; Gostian AO
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Apr; 52(1):28. PubMed ID: 37085925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence for Auditory Implants: First Results with a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant.
Wimmer W; Hakim A; Kiefer C; Pastore-Wapp M; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio MD; Wagner F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 31067530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality.
Carlson ML; Neff BA; Link MJ; Lane JI; Watson RE; McGee KP; Bernstein MA; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 25931165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability.
Sharon JD; Northcutt BG; Aygun N; Francis HW
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1284-90. PubMed ID: 27525711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
