BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33206242)

  • 1. Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.
    Schneider MA; Gero D; Müller M; Horisberger K; Rickenbacher A; Turina M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6227-6243. PubMed ID: 33206242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
    Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.
    Wei D; Johnston S; Goldstein L; Nagle D
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):610-621. PubMed ID: 31089882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
    Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
    Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
    Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
    Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
    Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A national database propensity score-matched comparison of minimally invasive and open colectomy for long-term opioid use.
    Bastawrous AL; Brockhaus KK; Chang MI; Milky G; Shih IF; Li Y; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):701-710. PubMed ID: 33569727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.
    Gandaglia G; Ghani KR; Sood A; Meyers JR; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Varda B; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Sun M; Menon M; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Oct; 149(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25143176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of hospital factors and socioeconomic status with the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer over a decade.
    Patel R; Pant K; Patel KS; Merchant AM; Alvarez-Downing MM
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3750-3762. PubMed ID: 34462866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
    Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved Morbidity, Mortality, and Cost with Minimally Invasive Colon Resection Compared to Open Surgery.
    Hakmi H; Amodu L; Petrone P; Islam S; Sohail AH; Bourgoin M; Sonoda T; Brathwaite CEM
    JSLS; 2022; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 35815326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors Associated With Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Emergency Settings.
    Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
    J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():75-82. PubMed ID: 31158727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
    Ejaz A; Sachs T; He J; Spolverato G; Hirose K; Ahuja N; Wolfgang CL; Makary MA; Weiss M; Pawlik TM
    Surgery; 2014 Sep; 156(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 25017135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for pathological N2M0 colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Mori S; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Nomura M; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):781-793. PubMed ID: 35715936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.