151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33206328)
1. Evaluating the Regional Uptake of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: a Report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
Unruh KR; Bastawrous AL; Bernier GV; Flum DR; Kumar AS; Moonka R; Thirlby RC; Simianu VV
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2387-2397. PubMed ID: 33206328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is robotic utilization associated with increased minimally invasive colorectal surgery rates? Surgeon-level evidence.
Justiniano CF; Becerra AZ; Loria A; Xu Z; Aquina CT; Temple LK; Fleming FJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5618-5626. PubMed ID: 35024928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Prolonged Operative Time Associated With Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Report From the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
Unruh KR; Bastawrous AL; Kanneganti S; Kaplan JA; Moonka R; Rashidi L; Sillah A; Simianu VV
Dis Colon Rectum; 2024 Feb; 67(2):302-312. PubMed ID: 37878484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regional variations and deprivation are linked to poorer access to laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a national study in England.
Morton AJ; Simpson A; Humes DJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 28(1):9. PubMed ID: 38078978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of obesity on minimally invasive colorectal surgery: A report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program collaborative.
Unruh KR; Bastawrous AL; Kaplan JA; Moonka R; Rashidi L; Simianu VV
Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 33745688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of the robotic surgery experience in minimally invasive surgery fellowships from 2010 to 2021.
Haywood N; Scott J; Zhang A; Hallowell P; Schirmer B
Surg Endosc; 2023 Dec; 37(12):9393-9398. PubMed ID: 37658200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating quality across minimally invasive platforms in colorectal surgery.
Keller DS; Flores-Gonzalez JR; Ibarra S; Madhoun N; Tahilramani R; Mahmood A; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26416377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Operations.
Hajirawala LN; Leonardi C; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Barton JS
Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):2129-2131. PubMed ID: 34318696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.
Mayo JS; Brazer ML; Bogenberger KJ; Tavares KB; Conrad RJ; Lustik MB; Gillern SM; Park CW; Richards CR
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2805-2816. PubMed ID: 32591939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.
Selby LV; DeMatteo RP; Tholey RM; Jarnagin WR; Garcia-Aguilar J; Strombom PD; Allen PJ; Kingham TP; Weiser MR; Brennan MF; Strong VE
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 28299807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Hospital Volume on Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer.
Dougherty K; Zhang Z; Montenegro G; Hinyard L; Xu E; Hsueh E; Luu C
Am Surg; 2023 Nov; 89(11):4569-4577. PubMed ID: 35999671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
