280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33207236)
1. Pelvic organ prolapse after 3 modes of hysterectomy: long-term follow-up.
Gabriel I; Kalousdian A; Brito LG; Abdalian T; Vitonis AF; Minassian VA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):496.e1-496.e10. PubMed ID: 33207236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy on the outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Mao M; Fu H; Wang Q; Bai J; Zhang Y; Guo R
Maturitas; 2023 Apr; 170():58-63. PubMed ID: 36773501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvic organ prolapse following hysterectomy on benign indication: a nationwide, nulliparous cohort study.
Husby KR; Gradel KO; Klarskov N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 226(3):386.e1-386.e9. PubMed ID: 34688595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysterectomy on benign indication and risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A national matched cohort study.
Aagesen AH; Klarskov N; Gradel KO; Husby KR
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jun; 102(6):774-781. PubMed ID: 37013371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statewide geographic variation in hysterectomy approach for pelvic organ prolapse: a county-level analysis.
Latack KR; Moniz M; Hong CX; Schmidt P; Malone A; Kamdar N; Madden B; Pizzo CA; Thompson MP; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 229(3):320.e1-320.e7. PubMed ID: 37244455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy: A 10-year national follow-up study.
Kuittinen T; Tulokas S; Rahkola-Soisalo P; Brummer T; Jalkanen J; Tomas E; Mäkinen J; Sjöberg J; Härkki P; Mentula M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):556-566. PubMed ID: 37014706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of modified laparoscopic hysterectomy on pelvic floor function: A retrospective observational study.
Lee CY; Tseng CJ; Chang CH; Lee MC; Ou YC; Yang SF
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(8):e14616. PubMed ID: 30813190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of Oophorectomy at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Lua LL; Kosiorek HE; Wasson MN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 30343033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors Influencing Selection of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, or Robotic Surgery to Treat Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse.
Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Gebhart JB
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 26945273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic assessment of surgical complications in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Mothes AR; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():228-32. PubMed ID: 26451889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LAVH superior to TVH when concomitant salpingo-oophorectomy is intended in prolapse hysterectomy: a comparative cohort study.
Mothes AR; Schlachetzki A; Nicolaus K; Vorwergk J; Lehmann T; Radosa MP; Mothes HK; Runnebaum IB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 30306309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term adherence to pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
Koch M; Carlin G; Lange S; Umek W; Krall C; Bodner-Adler B
Maturitas; 2023 Dec; 178():107828. PubMed ID: 37659128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery after native tissue vault suspension at hysterectomy-A prospective cohort study.
Bonde L; Østergaard L; Fosbøl EL; Møller LA; Ottesen B; Gislason GH; Gimbel H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():144-150. PubMed ID: 31284088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
