159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33207627)
1. Risk Factors for Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Ponce J; Fernandez-Gonzalez S; Gil-Moreno A; Coronado PJ; De la Rosa J; Nabais H; Hernández G; Taltavull A; Gilabert-Estelles J; Martínez-Román S; Barahona M; Barahona M; Martínez-Maestre MÁ
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 33207627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Surgical Practice on Oncological Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer, Spanish National Registry.
Fernandez-Gonzalez S; Ponce J; Martínez-Maestre MÁ; Barahona M; Gómez-Hidalgo NR; Díaz-Feijoo B; Casajuana A; Gracia M; Frias-Gomez J; Benavente Y; Costas L; Martí L; Melero L; Silvan JM; Beiro E; Lobo I; De la Rosa J; Coronado PJ; Gil-Moreno A
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jan; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35158966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study.
Hoogendam JP; Verheijen RH; Wegner I; Zweemer RP
BJOG; 2014 Nov; 121(12):1538-45. PubMed ID: 24735243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oncological Results of Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Should We Really Abandon Minimally Invasive Surgery?
Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Fusté P; Díaz-Feijóo B; Glickman A; Paredes P; Rovirosa A; Gaba L; Saco A; Nicolau C; Carreras N; Agustí N; Vidal-Sicart S; Gil-Ibáñez B; Del Pino M
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 33671382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First experience of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute using the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach in radical hysterectomies for cervical cancer.
Zaghloul AS; El-Minawi AM; ElKordy MA; Younes AK; Mahmoud AM; Fadlalla WM; Mohamed GA
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2018 Jun; 30(2):61-67. PubMed ID: 29691094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators.
Boria F; Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Shamistan A; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Alonso-Espías M; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Manzour N; Jurado M; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Sep; 31(9):1212-1219. PubMed ID: 34321289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer.
Boria F; Chiva L; Chacon E; Zanagnolo V; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Shamistan A; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Zusterzeel PLM; Aluloski I; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Demirkiran F; Vorgias G; Povolotskaya N; Coronado Martín PJ; Marina T; Zapardiel I; Bizzarri N; Gorostidi M; Gutierrez M; Manzour N; Berasaluce A; Martin-Calvo N;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Oct; 32(10):1236-1243. PubMed ID: 36583728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multi-institution Study and a Review of the Literature.
Corrado G; Vizza E; Legge F; Pedone Anchora L; Sperduti I; Fagotti A; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Zampa A; Chiofalo B; Scambia G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):1020-1028. PubMed ID: 29727351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy (mLPS-RH) vs laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy (LESS-RH) in early stage cervical cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Fagotti A; Ghezzi F; Boruta DM; Scambia G; Escobar P; Fader AN; Malzoni M; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 24768978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for recurrence in patients with stage IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation.
Lin HH; Cheng WF; Chan KW; Chang DY; Chen CK; Huang SC
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 88(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 8692515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Hoekstra AV; Jairam-Thodla A; Singh DK; Buttin BM; Lurain JR; Schink JC
J Robot Surg; 2009 Mar; 3(1):19. PubMed ID: 27628448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
