160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33207627)
21. A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Hoekstra AV; Jairam-Thodla A; Singh DK; Buttin BM; Lurain JR; Schink JC
J Robot Surg; 2009 Mar; 3(1):19. PubMed ID: 27628448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robot-assisted total preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerve with extended systematic lymphadenectomy as part of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee YS; Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 23792607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer.
Pol FJ; Zusterzeel PL; van Ham MA; Kuijpers DA; Bulten J; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 26126782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A prospective multicenter trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer (SENTIX).
Cibula D; Dusek J; Jarkovsky J; Dundr P; Querleu D; van der Zee A; Kucukmetin A; Kocian R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jan; 29(1):212-215. PubMed ID: 30640706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: an outcomes analysis.
dos Reis R; Frumovitz M; Milam MR; Capp E; Sun CC; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 17854872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early cervical cancer].
Maffuz A; Quijano F; López D; Hernández-Ramírez D
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2010 Jul; 78(7):345-51. PubMed ID: 20931810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study.
Eoh KJ; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32093687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.
Angeles MA; Martínez-Gómez C; Migliorelli F; Voglimacci M; Figurelli J; Motton S; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Ferron G; Martinez A
Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(12):73. PubMed ID: 30411170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of time interval between radical hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection and initial adjuvant therapy on oncological outcomes of early stage cervical cancer.
Hanprasertpong J; Jiamset I; Geater A; Leetanaporn K; Peerawong T
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 28(4):e42. PubMed ID: 28541633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Oncologic outcome after completing or abandoning (radical) hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and intraoperative detection of lymph node positivity; ABRAX (ABandoning RAd hyst in cerviX cancer).
Dostalek L; Runnebaum I; Raspagliesi F; Vergote I; Dusek L; Jarkovsky J; Cibula D
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):261-264. PubMed ID: 31748245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Yan X; Li G; Shang H; Lin F; Yang X; Zheng F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22146764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
