125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33208573)
1. Mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering resin composites after different aging regimes.
Stawarczyk B; Brauneis M; Langwieder B; Spintzyk S; Eichberger M; Liebermann A
Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 33208573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Edge chipping resistance of veneering composite resins.
Zadeh PN; Stawarczyk B; Hampe R; Liebermann A; Mayinger F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 116():104349. PubMed ID: 33561676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of thermocycling on mechanical properties and discoloration of veneering composite resins after storage in various staining media.
Liebermann A; Langwieder B; Brauneis M; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):940-945. PubMed ID: 32624221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of polymerization and storage on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of veneering resin composites.
Mayinger F; Reymus M; Liebermann A; Richter M; Kubryk P; Großekappenberg H; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 33342921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Different Postpolymerization Strategies and Artificial Aging on Hardness of 3D-Printed Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):634-640. PubMed ID: 33284905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Hampe R; Lümkemann N; Sener B; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():191-198. PubMed ID: 29986293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of in vitro aging on the mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering composite resins.
Stawarczyk B; Egli R; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle CH
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):386-98. PubMed ID: 22133396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of varnishing, coating, and polishing on the chemical and mechanical properties of a 3D printed resin and two veneering composite resins.
Lask M; Stawarczyk B; Reymus M; Meinen J; Mayinger F
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38797579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time-dependent degree of conversion, Martens parameters, and flexural strength of different dual-polymerizing resin composite luting materials.
Kelch M; Stawarczyk B; Mayinger F
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 34342762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.
Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of storage medium and aging duration on mechanical properties of self-adhesive resin-based cements.
Liebermann A; Ilie N; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2017 Jul; 15(3):e206-e214. PubMed ID: 28574094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chemical and mechanical properties of dual-polymerizing core build-up materials.
Kelch M; Stawarczyk B; Mayinger F
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4885-4896. PubMed ID: 35344103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 32444206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different PEEK qualities irradiated with light of different wavelengths: Impact on Martens hardness.
Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):968-975. PubMed ID: 28662860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of three food-simulating liquids on the roughness and hardness of CAD/CAM polymer composites.
Babaier R; Watts DC; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):874-885. PubMed ID: 35431089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Water-induced Effects on the Hardness and Modulus of Contemporary Sealants Derived from Instrumented Indentation Testing (IIT).
Diener V; Zinelis S; Eliades T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 20(6):653-656. PubMed ID: 31358704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
Leprince JG; Palin WM; Vanacker J; Sabbagh J; Devaux J; Leloup G
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Jung JH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-body wear resistance of some indirect composite resins.
Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Shabanian M; Anbari Z
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 19(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 21780731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices.
Berli C; Thieringer FM; Sharma N; Müller JA; Dedem P; Fischer J; Rohr N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):780-786. PubMed ID: 31955837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
