These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33209012)

  • 1. IDENTIFICATION AND INFERENCE FOR MARGINAL AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT ON THE TREATED WITH AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE.
    Liu L; Miao W; Sun B; Robins J; Tchetgen ET
    Stat Sin; 2020 Jul; 30(3):1517-1541. PubMed ID: 33209012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
    Liu T; Hogan JW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.
    Wang L; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 36377509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doubly robust estimation and sensitivity analysis for marginal structural quantile models.
    Cheng C; Hu L; Li F
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38884127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instrumental variable estimation of the marginal structural Cox model for time-varying treatments.
    Cui Y; Michael H; Tanser F; Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Biometrika; 2023 Mar; 110(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 36798841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doubly robust nonparametric instrumental variable estimators for survival outcomes.
    Lee Y; Kennedy EH; Mitra N
    Biostatistics; 2023 Apr; 24(2):518-537. PubMed ID: 34676400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiply robust causal inference with double-negative control adjustment for categorical unmeasured confounding.
    Shi X; Miao W; Nelson JC; Tchetgen EJT
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2020 Apr; 82(2):521-540. PubMed ID: 33376449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variables.
    Wang L; Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2018 Jun; 80(3):531-550. PubMed ID: 30034269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiparametric Estimation with Data Missing Not at Random Using an Instrumental Variable.
    Sun B; Liu L; Miao W; Wirth K; Robins J; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Stat Sin; 2018 Oct; 28(4):1965-1983. PubMed ID: 33335381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On Variance of the Treatment Effect in the Treated When Estimated by Inverse Probability Weighting.
    Reifeis SA; Hudgens MG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 35106534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The productivity of mental health care: an instrumental variable approach.
    Lu M
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 1999 Jun; 2(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 11967410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causal inference with measurement error in outcomes: Bias analysis and estimation methods.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2049-2068. PubMed ID: 29241426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Instrumental variable estimation of truncated local average treatment effects.
    Choi BY
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249642. PubMed ID: 33819276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doubly Robust Estimation in Observational Studies with Partial Interference.
    Liu L; Hudgens MG; Saul B; Clemens JD; Ali M; Emch ME
    Stat (Int Stat Inst); 2019; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31440374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.