These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33209410)

  • 1. Coronary artery calcium scoring on non-gated, non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) using wide-detector, high-pitch and fast gantry rotation: comparison with dedicated calcium scoring CT.
    Shin JM; Kim TH; Kim JY; Park CH
    J Thorac Dis; 2020 Oct; 12(10):5783-5793. PubMed ID: 33209410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of fully automated commercial software for Agatston calcium scoring on non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT with different slice thickness.
    Kang HW; Ahn WJ; Jeong JH; Suh YJ; Yang DH; Choi H; Hwang SH; Yong HS; Oh YW; Kang EY; Kim C
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):1973-1981. PubMed ID: 36152039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of cardiovascular risk on routine chest CT: Ordinal coronary artery calcium scoring as an accurate predictor of Agatston score ranges.
    Azour L; Kadoch MA; Ward TJ; Eber CD; Jacobi AH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27743881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated total and vessel-specific coronary artery calcium (CAC) quantification on chest CT: direct comparison with CAC scoring on non-contrast cardiac CT.
    Yu J; Qian L; Sun W; Nie Z; Zheng D; Han P; Shi H; Zheng C; Yang F
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Oct; 22(1):177. PubMed ID: 36241978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Nongated Chest CT and Dedicated Calcium Scoring CT for Coronary Calcium Quantification Using a 256-Dector Row CT Scanner.
    Chen Y; Hu Z; Li M; Jia Y; He T; Liu Z; Wei D; Yu Y
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e267-e274. PubMed ID: 30685312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Dual-Energy Chest Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparison with Electrocardiogram-Gated Calcium Score Computed Tomography.
    Lee SY; Kim TH; Han K; Shin JM; Kim JY; Kim D; Park CH
    J Clin Med; 2021 Feb; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33567707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of Simple Evaluation of Coronary Artery Calcium Using a Number of Chest Computed Tomography Slices: A Multicenter Study.
    Yamamoto H; Fujimoto S; Aoshima C; Minamino T; Fujii T; Wakabayashi S; Urabe Y; Ueda H; Kunita E; Abe M; Higashino H
    Ann Vasc Dis; 2023 Mar; 16(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 37006870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Clinical Applicability of Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment on Non-Gated Chest Computed Tomography, Compared With the Classic Agatston Score on Cardiac Computed Tomography.
    Groen RA; Jukema JW; van Dijkman PRM; Timmermans PT; Bax JJ; Lamb HJ; de Graaf MA
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 208():92-100. PubMed ID: 37820552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic coronary artery calcium scoring on routine chest computed tomography (CT): comparison of a deep learning algorithm and a dedicated calcium scoring CT.
    Xu C; Guo H; Xu M; Duan M; Wang M; Liu P; Luo X; Jin Z; Liu H; Wang Y
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 May; 12(5):2684-2695. PubMed ID: 35502379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary calcium screening with dual-source CT: reliability of ungated, high-pitch chest CT in comparison with dedicated calcium-scoring CT.
    Hutt A; Duhamel A; Deken V; Faivre JB; Molinari F; Remy J; Remy-Jardin M
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1521-8. PubMed ID: 26340814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility and limitations of deep learning-based coronary calcium scoring in PET-CT: a comparison with coronary calcium score CT.
    Oh HS; Kim TH; Kim JW; Yang J; Lee HS; Lee JH; Park CH
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):4077-4088. PubMed ID: 37962596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of artery-based methods for ordinal grading of coronary artery calcium on low-dose chest computed tomography.
    Lee S; Suh YJ; Nam K; Lee K; Lee HJ; Choi BW
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8108-8115. PubMed ID: 33885959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
    Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of epicardial adipose tissue volume quantification between ECG-gated cardiac and non-ECG-gated chest computed tomography scans.
    Xu Y; Hrybouski S; Paterson DI; Li Z; Lan Y; Luo L; Shen X; Xu L
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Dec; 22(1):545. PubMed ID: 36513994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated coronary artery calcification scoring in non-gated chest CT: agreement and reliability.
    Takx RA; de Jong PA; Leiner T; Oudkerk M; de Koning HJ; Mol CP; Viergever MA; Išgum I
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91239. PubMed ID: 24625525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Modified Length-Based Grading Method for Assessing Coronary Artery Calcium Severity on Non-Electrocardiogram-Gated Chest Computed Tomography: A Multiple-Observer Study.
    Kim SY; Suh YJ; Kim NY; Lee S; Nam K; Kim J; Kim H; Lee H; Han K; Yong HS
    Korean J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):284-293. PubMed ID: 36996903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of computed tomography slice thickness on deep learning-based, automatic coronary artery calcium scoring software performance.
    Kim SY; Suh YJ; Lee HJ; Kim H; Seo H; Park HJ; Yang DH
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Jul; 13(7):4257-4267. PubMed ID: 37456306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary artery calcium scoring assessment in ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography.
    Xiao H; Wang X; Yang P; Wang L; Xu J
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Feb; 106():110045. PubMed ID: 38056107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium scoring and radiation Dose on 64- and 16-slice computed tomography by prospective electrocardiographically-triggered axial and retrospective electrocardiographically-gated spiral computed tomography: a phantom study.
    Horiguchi J; Kiguchi M; Fujioka C; Arie R; Shen Y; Sunasaka K; Kitagawa T; Yamamoto H; Ito K
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):958-65. PubMed ID: 18620116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT.
    Suh YJ; Kim C; Lee JG; Oh H; Kang H; Kim YH; Yang DH
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Feb; 33(2):1254-1265. PubMed ID: 36098798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.