These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33210496)

  • 1. Use of modified Delphi introduces the risk of chronological bias during clinical research interventions.
    Armstrong K; Nadim H; Olson D; Stutzman S
    Nurse Res; 2021 Mar; 29(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 33210496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias due to MEasurement Reactions In Trials to improve health (MERIT): protocol for research to develop MRC guidance.
    Miles LM; Elbourne D; Farmer A; Gulliford M; Locock L; McCambridge J; Sutton S; French DP
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):653. PubMed ID: 30477551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations when conducting e-Delphi research: a case study.
    Toronto C
    Nurse Res; 2017 Jun; 25(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 28639525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of advanced web-based survey design in Delphi research.
    Helms C; Gardner A; McInnes E
    J Adv Nurs; 2017 Dec; 73(12):3168-3177. PubMed ID: 28714173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consideration of methodological issues when using photo-elicitation in qualitative research.
    Church S; Quilter J
    Nurse Res; 2021 Jun; 29(2):25-32. PubMed ID: 33569938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
    Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK
    Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.
    Hasson F; Keeney S; McKenna H
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Oct; 32(4):1008-15. PubMed ID: 11095242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standing outside the interview process? The illusion of objectivity in phenomenological data generation.
    Lowes L; Prowse MA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2001 Aug; 38(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 11470105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a Delphi Method to Identify Human Factors Contributing to Nursing Errors.
    Roth C; Brewer M; Wieck KL
    Nurs Forum; 2017 Jul; 52(3):173-179. PubMed ID: 27434130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing.
    Keeney S; Hasson F; McKenna HP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2001 Apr; 38(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 11223060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequate.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():104-113. PubMed ID: 31132470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing?
    Carr LT
    J Adv Nurs; 1994 Oct; 20(4):716-21. PubMed ID: 7822608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
    Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appraising the quality of mixed methods research in nursing: A qualitative case study of nurse researchers' views.
    Fàbregues S; Paré MH
    Nurs Inq; 2018 Oct; 25(4):e12247. PubMed ID: 29927008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development.
    Keeley T; Williamson P; Callery P; Jones LL; Mathers J; Jones J; Young B; Calvert M
    Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):230. PubMed ID: 27142835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Action research from the inside: issues and challenges in doing action research in your own hospital.
    Coghlan D; Casey M
    J Adv Nurs; 2001 Sep; 35(5):674-82. PubMed ID: 11529969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An exploratory study into a methodology for the examination of decision making by nurses in the clinical area.
    Watson S
    J Adv Nurs; 1994 Aug; 20(2):351-60. PubMed ID: 7930155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misclassification and measurement error - planning a study and interpreting results.
    Alfred Frost S; Alexandrou E
    Nurse Res; 2021 Mar; 29(1):21-25. PubMed ID: 33410311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keeping nurse researchers safe: workplace health and safety issues.
    Barr J; Welch A
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Jul; 68(7):1538-45. PubMed ID: 22309294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set.
    Chiarotto A; Terwee CB; Deyo RA; Boers M; Lin CW; Buchbinder R; Corbin TP; Costa LO; Foster NE; Grotle M; Koes BW; Kovacs FM; Maher CG; Pearson AM; Peul WC; Schoene ML; Turk DC; van Tulder MW; Ostelo RW
    Trials; 2014 Dec; 15():511. PubMed ID: 25540987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.