These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33211510)

  • 21. The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation.
    Vachon F; Marsh JE; Labonté K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jul; 149(7):1360-1397. PubMed ID: 31750710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emotionality effects in ambiguous word recognition: The crucial role of the affective congruence between distinct meanings of ambiguous words.
    Ferré P; Haro J; Huete-Pérez D; Fraga I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 33438523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semantic priming by pictures and words in the cerebral hemispheres.
    Koivisto M; Revonsuo A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 10(1-2):91-8. PubMed ID: 10978696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime words.
    Klauer KC; Eder AB; Greenwald AG; Abrams RL
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Mar; 16(1):63-83. PubMed ID: 16464617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A divergent effect of stimulus perceptual details on affective and semantic representations of valence.
    Olteanu L; Salama K; Kimchi R; Kron A
    Emotion; 2023 Aug; 23(5):1236-1253. PubMed ID: 36074618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory affective processing requires awareness.
    Lähteenmäki M; Kauramäki J; Sauter DA; Nummenmaa L
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 29504800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Audiovisual semantic interactions between linguistic and nonlinguistic stimuli: The time-courses and categorical specificity.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1488-1507. PubMed ID: 29708379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Professional Music Training and Novel Word Learning: From Faster Semantic Encoding to Longer-lasting Word Representations.
    Dittinger E; Barbaroux M; D'Imperio M; Jäncke L; Elmer S; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1584-602. PubMed ID: 27315272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Crossmodal semantic congruence can affect visuo-spatial processing and activity of the fronto-parietal attention networks.
    Mastroberardino S; Santangelo V; Macaluso E
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2015; 9():45. PubMed ID: 26217199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Semantic priming in the prime task effect: evidence of automatic semantic processing of distractors.
    Marí-Beffa P; Fuentes LJ; Catena A; Houghton G
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 10946546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Asymmetries in the processing of emotionally valenced words.
    Dahl M
    Scand J Psychol; 2001 Apr; 42(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11321641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluative decision latencies mediated by induced affective states.
    Hermans D; De Houwer J; Eelen P
    Behav Res Ther; 1996; 34(5-6):483-8. PubMed ID: 8687370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preferences and inferences in encoding visual objects: a systematic comparison of semantic and affective priming.
    Storbeck J; Robinson MD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Jan; 30(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 15030645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times.
    Bürki A; Madec S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):1019-1046. PubMed ID: 35389697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can automatic picture processing influence word judgments?
    Lupker SJ; Katz AN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1982 Sep; 8(5):418-34. PubMed ID: 6215463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interference of spoken word recognition through phonological priming from visual objects and printed words.
    McQueen JM; Huettig F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 24132709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distributional properties of semantic interference in picture naming: Bayesian meta-analyses.
    Fuhrmeister P; Bürki A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):635-647. PubMed ID: 34738184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the latency of object recognition and affect: Evidence from speeded reaction time tasks.
    Franikowski P; Reisenzein R
    Emotion; 2023 Mar; 23(2):486-503. PubMed ID: 35420832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing.
    Koelsch S; Kasper E; Sammler D; Schulze K; Gunter T; Friederici AD
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 7(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 14983184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.