These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33211533)

  • 41. Dissecting "Peer Presence" and "Decisions" to Deepen Understanding of Peer Influence on Adolescent Risky Choice.
    Somerville LH; Haddara N; Sasse SF; Skwara AC; Moran JM; Figner B
    Child Dev; 2019 Nov; 90(6):2086-2103. PubMed ID: 29701282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 1: Decision making under physical performance pressure in elite athletes.
    Parkin BL; Warriner K; Walsh V
    Prog Brain Res; 2017; 234():291-316. PubMed ID: 29031468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Test-retest reliability of brain responses to risk-taking during the balloon analogue risk task.
    Li X; Pan Y; Fang Z; Lei H; Zhang X; Shi H; Ma N; Raine P; Wetherill R; Kim JJ; Wan Y; Rao H
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116495. PubMed ID: 31887425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. More than just co-workers: Presence of humanoid robot co-worker influences human performance.
    Vasalya A; Ganesh G; Kheddar A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206698. PubMed ID: 30408062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Advancing the Strategic Messages Affecting Robot Trust Effect: The Dynamic of User- and Robot-Generated Content on Human-Robot Trust and Interaction Outcomes.
    Liang YJ; Lee SA
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Sep; 19(9):538-44. PubMed ID: 27585068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Test-retest characteristics of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).
    White TL; Lejuez CW; de Wit H
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2008 Dec; 16(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 19086777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Consequences for peers differentially bias computations about risk across development.
    Powers KE; Yaffe G; Hartley CA; Davidow JY; Kober H; Somerville LH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):671-682. PubMed ID: 29355369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Paying out one versus paying out all trials and the decrease in behavioral and brain activity in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.
    Xu S; Wang H; Wang C
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13510. PubMed ID: 31793670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Effect of Active and Passive Peer Discouragement on Adolescent Risk taking: An Experimental Study.
    de Boer A; Harakeh Z
    J Res Adolesc; 2017 Dec; 27(4):878-889. PubMed ID: 29152864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Why Robots Should Be Social: Enhancing Machine Learning through Social Human-Robot Interaction.
    de Greeff J; Belpaeme T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138061. PubMed ID: 26422143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robots Are Not All the Same: Young Adults' Expectations, Attitudes, and Mental Attribution to Two Humanoid Social Robots.
    Manzi F; Massaro D; Di Lernia D; Maggioni MA; Riva G; Marchetti A
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2021 May; 24(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 33181030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of robotic shoal size, configuration, and activity on zebrafish behavior in a free-swimming environment.
    Butail S; Polverino G; Phamduy P; Del Sette F; Porfiri M
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Dec; 275():269-80. PubMed ID: 25239605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Age-Related Differences in the Uncanny Valley Effect.
    Tu YC; Chien SE; Yeh SL
    Gerontology; 2020; 66(4):382-392. PubMed ID: 32526760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Brain structural correlates of risk-taking behavior and effects of peer influence in adolescents.
    Kwon MS; Vorobyev V; Moe D; Parkkola R; Hämäläinen H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112780. PubMed ID: 25389976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is the Peer Presence Effect on Heightened Adolescent Risky Decision-Making only Present in Males?
    Defoe IN; Dubas JS; Dalmaijer ES; van Aken MAG
    J Youth Adolesc; 2020 Mar; 49(3):693-705. PubMed ID: 31863339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. HiMoP: A three-component architecture to create more human-acceptable social-assistive robots : Motivational architecture for assistive robots.
    Rodríguez-Lera FJ; Matellán-Olivera V; Conde-González MÁ; Martín-Rico F
    Cogn Process; 2018 May; 19(2):233-244. PubMed ID: 29305760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
    Steain A; Stanton CJ; Stevens CJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222975. PubMed ID: 31618216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Feeling committed to a robot: why, what, when and how?
    Powell H; Michael J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 374(1771):20180039. PubMed ID: 30853005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Peers influence adolescent reward processing, but not response inhibition.
    Smith AR; Rosenbaum GM; Botdorf MA; Steinberg L; Chein JM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 29470796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. ERP markers of action planning and outcome monitoring in human - robot interaction.
    Hinz NA; Ciardo F; Wykowska A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103216. PubMed ID: 33285360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.