These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33212744)

  • 1. Spontaneous symmetry breaking of active phase in coevolving nonlinear voter model.
    Jędrzejewski A; Toruniewska J; Suchecki K; Zaikin O; Hołyst JA
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Oct; 102(4-1):042313. PubMed ID: 33212744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phase transition in a coevolving network of conformist and contrarian voters.
    Yi SD; Baek SK; Zhu CP; Kim BJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Jan; 87(1):012806. PubMed ID: 23410387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fragmentation transitions in a coevolving nonlinear voter model.
    Min B; Miguel MS
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12864. PubMed ID: 28993664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zealots in the mean-field noisy voter model.
    Khalil N; San Miguel M; Toral R
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jan; 97(1-1):012310. PubMed ID: 29448335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetric coevolutionary voter dynamics.
    Wieland S; Nunes A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Dec; 88(6):062809. PubMed ID: 24483513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitting in and breaking up: A nonlinear version of coevolving voter models.
    Kureh YH; Porter MA
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Jun; 101(6-1):062303. PubMed ID: 32688568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discontinuous phase transitions in the multi-state noisy q-voter model: quenched vs. annealed disorder.
    Nowak B; Stoń B; Sznajd-Weron K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6098. PubMed ID: 33731793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonlinear q-voter model from the quenched perspective.
    Jędrzejewski A; Sznajd-Weron K
    Chaos; 2020 Jan; 30(1):013150. PubMed ID: 32013464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear q-voter model.
    Castellano C; Muñoz MA; Pastor-Satorras R
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Oct; 80(4 Pt 1):041129. PubMed ID: 19905295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pair approximation for the q-voter models with quenched disorder on networks.
    Jędrzejewski A; Sznajd-Weron K
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Jun; 105(6-1):064306. PubMed ID: 35854498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Veritable Zoology of Successive Phase Transitions in the Asymmetric
    Chmiel A; Sienkiewicz J; Fronczak A; Fronczak P
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Sep; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 33286787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized contact process with two symmetric absorbing states in two dimensions.
    Lee MY; Vojta T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Jan; 83(1 Pt 1):011114. PubMed ID: 21405668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coupling of link- and node-ordering in the coevolving voter model.
    Toruniewska J; Kułakowski K; Suchecki K; Hołyst JA
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Oct; 96(4-1):042306. PubMed ID: 29347606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voter model on a directed network: role of bidirectional opinion exchanges.
    Han SG; Um J; Kim BJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 May; 81(5 Pt 2):057103. PubMed ID: 20866358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zealotry effects on opinion dynamics in the adaptive voter model.
    Klamser PP; Wiedermann M; Donges JF; Donner RV
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Nov; 96(5-1):052315. PubMed ID: 29347768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discontinuous phase transitions in the q-voter model with generalized anticonformity on random graphs.
    Abramiuk-Szurlej A; Lipiecki A; Pawłowski J; Sznajd-Weron K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17719. PubMed ID: 34489517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Q-voter model with independence on signed random graphs: Homogeneous approximations.
    Krawiecki A; Gradowski T
    Phys Rev E; 2024 Jan; 109(1-1):014302. PubMed ID: 38366489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact process with sublattice symmetry breaking.
    de Oliveira MM; Dickman R
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Jul; 84(1 Pt 1):011125. PubMed ID: 21867131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symmetrical threshold model with independence on random graphs.
    Nowak B; Sznajd-Weron K
    Phys Rev E; 2020 May; 101(5-1):052316. PubMed ID: 32575267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic behavior of driven interfaces in models with two absorbing states.
    Kwon S; Hwang W; Park H
    Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics; 1999 May; 59(5 Pt A):4949-52. PubMed ID: 11969448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.