These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33213150)
1. How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations? Hao D; He X; Ji B; Zhang S; Wang J J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6624-6633. PubMed ID: 33213150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3. He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations. Wang J; Hou T J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes. Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking. Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free energy calculations to estimate ligand-binding affinities in structure-based drug design. Reddy MR; Reddy CR; Rathore RS; Erion MD; Aparoy P; Reddy RN; Reddanna P Curr Pharm Des; 2014; 20(20):3323-37. PubMed ID: 23947646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design. Wang E; Sun H; Wang J; Wang Z; Liu H; Zhang JZH; Hou T Chem Rev; 2019 Aug; 119(16):9478-9508. PubMed ID: 31244000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking. Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binding Free Energies of Conformationally Disordered Peptides Through Extensive Sampling and End-Point Methods. Nixon MG; Fadda E Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2039():229-242. PubMed ID: 31342430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models. Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions. Mishra SK; Koča J J Phys Chem B; 2018 Aug; 122(34):8113-8121. PubMed ID: 30084252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Genheden S; Ryde U Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 May; 10(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 25835573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations. Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and precision of binding free energy prediction for a tacrine related lead inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase with an arsenal of supercomputerized molecular modelling methods: a comparative study. Dolezal R J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2022; 40(21):11291-11319. PubMed ID: 34323654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and test of highly accurate endpoint free energy methods. 1: Evaluation of ABCG2 charge model on solvation free energy prediction and optimization of atom radii suitable for more accurate solvation free energy prediction by the PBSA method. Sun Y; He X; Hou T; Cai L; Man VH; Wang J J Comput Chem; 2023 May; 44(14):1334-1346. PubMed ID: 36807356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uni-GBSA: an open-source and web-based automatic workflow to perform MM/GB(PB)SA calculations for virtual screening. Yang M; Bo Z; Xu T; Xu B; Wang D; Zheng H Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jul; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 37328705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the performance of docking, FEP, and MM/GBSA methods on a series of KLK6 inhibitors. Lima Silva WJ; Ferreira de Freitas R J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Sep; 37(9):407-418. PubMed ID: 37378817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches. Sun H; Duan L; Chen F; Liu H; Wang Z; Pan P; Zhu F; Zhang JZH; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 May; 20(21):14450-14460. PubMed ID: 29785435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP. Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]