These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33216777)
1. Understanding how midwives employed by the National Health Service facilitate women's alternative birthing choices: Findings from a feminist pragmatist study. Feeley C; Thomson G; Downe S PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242508. PubMed ID: 33216777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Stories of distress versus fulfilment': A narrative inquiry of midwives' experiences supporting alternative birth choices in the UK National Health Service. Feeley C; Downe S; Thomson G Women Birth; 2022 Sep; 35(5):e446-e455. PubMed ID: 34862131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan. Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do pregnancy and birth experiences influence planned place of birth in future pregnancies? Findings from a longitudinal, narrative study. Coxon K; Sandall J; Fulop NJ Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25676885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach. Coxon K; Chisholm A; Malouf R; Rowe R; Hollowell J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):103. PubMed ID: 28359258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring midwives' perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study. Nicholls S; Hauck YL; Bayes S; Butt J Midwifery; 2016 Feb; 33():73-81. PubMed ID: 26549568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth. Boyle S; Thomas H; Brooks F Midwifery; 2016 Jan; 32():21-9. PubMed ID: 26597110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A qualitative study of factors that influence midwives' practice in relation to low-risk women's oral intake in labour in Australia. Tadaumi M; Sweet L; Graham K Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e455-e463. PubMed ID: 31796342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups. Hinton L; Dumelow C; Rowe R; Hollowell J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 29310599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis. Hollander M; de Miranda E; van Dillen J; de Graaf I; Vandenbussche F; Holten L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):423. PubMed ID: 29246129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midwives' experience of personal/professional risk when providing continuity of care to women who decline recommendations: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Ford P; Crowther S; Waller N Women Birth; 2023 Mar; 36(2):e283-e294. PubMed ID: 35869010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Caring for women making unconventional birth choices: A meta-ethnography exploring the views, attitudes, and experiences of midwives. Feeley C; Thomson G; Downe S Midwifery; 2019 May; 72():50-59. PubMed ID: 30776740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autonomous and dependent-The dichotomy of birth: A feminist analysis of birth plans in Sweden. Westergren A; Edin K; Walsh D; Christianson M Midwifery; 2019 Jan; 68():56-64. PubMed ID: 30366225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pregnancy as an ideal time for intervention to address the complex needs of black and minority ethnic women: views of British midwives. Aquino MR; Edge D; Smith DM Midwifery; 2015 Mar; 31(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 25483209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designing a Midwife-Led Birth Center Program Based on the MAP-IT Model: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study. Bakhshi M; Mollazadeh S; Khadivzadeh T; Moghri J; Saki A; Firoozi M Reprod Health; 2024 Jul; 21(1):102. PubMed ID: 38965578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a health promotion intervention associated with birthing centres in rural Nepal. Mahato P; van Teijlingen E; Simkhada P; Angell C; Hundley V PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233607. PubMed ID: 32442234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package. Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study. Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empowering change: realist evaluation of a Scottish Government programme to support normal birth. Cheyne H; Abhyankar P; McCourt C Midwifery; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1110-21. PubMed ID: 23968777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing midwives' intentions to facilitate normal physiological birth: A qualitative study. Meyer H; Lee N; George K; Kearney L Women Birth; 2024 Jul; 37(4):101617. PubMed ID: 38701683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]