182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33217206)
1. Making the most of all data: Combining non-genotyped and genotyped potato individuals with HBLUP.
Sood S; Lin Z; Caruana B; Slater AT; Daetwyler HD
Plant Genome; 2020 Nov; 13(3):e20056. PubMed ID: 33217206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Realized genomic selection across generations in a reciprocal recurrent selection breeding program of
Simiqueli GF; Resende RT; Takahashi EK; de Sousa JE; Grattapaglia D
Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1252504. PubMed ID: 37965018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving genomic prediction of growth and wood traits in Eucalyptus using phenotypes from non-genotyped trees by single-step GBLUP.
Cappa EP; de Lima BM; da Silva-Junior OB; Garcia CC; Mansfield SD; Grattapaglia D
Plant Sci; 2019 Jul; 284():9-15. PubMed ID: 31084883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.
Gowane GR; Alex R; Mukherjee A; Vohra V
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Oct; 54(6):339. PubMed ID: 36210357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-step genomic BLUP enables joint analysis of disconnected breeding programs: an example with Eucalyptus globulus Labill.
Callister AN; Bradshaw BP; Elms S; Gillies RAW; Sasse JM; Brawner JT
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34568915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genome-enabled prediction for tick resistance in Hereford and Braford beef cattle via reaction norm models.
Mota RR; Lopes PS; Tempelman RJ; Silva FF; Aguilar I; Gomes CC; Cardoso FF
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1834-43. PubMed ID: 27285681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the analysis of low heritability complex traits for enhanced genetic gain in potato.
Slater AT; Wilson GM; Cogan NO; Forster JW; Hayes BJ
Theor Appl Genet; 2014 Apr; 127(4):809-20. PubMed ID: 24374468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction based on estimated breeding values using genealogy for tuber yield and late blight resistance in auto-tetraploid potato (
Sood S; Bhardwaj V; Kaushik SK; Sharma S
Heliyon; 2020 Nov; 6(11):e05624. PubMed ID: 33305041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic studies with preselected markers reveal dominance effects influencing growth traits in Eucalyptus nitens.
Thumma BR; Joyce KR; Jacobs A
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction in maize breeding populations with genotyping-by-sequencing.
Crossa J; Beyene Y; Kassa S; Pérez P; Hickey JM; Chen C; de los Campos G; Burgueño J; Windhausen VS; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Lopez Cruz MA; Babu R
G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Nov; 3(11):1903-26. PubMed ID: 24022750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.
Gao H; Christensen OF; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):8. PubMed ID: 22455934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic dissection and prediction of feed intake and residual feed intake traits using a longitudinal model in F2 chickens.
Emamgholi Begli H; Vaez Torshizi R; Masoudi AA; Ehsani A; Jensen J
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1792-1798. PubMed ID: 29268803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction.
Gowane GR; Lee SH; Clark S; Moghaddar N; Al-Mamun HA; van der Werf JHJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Sep; 136(5):390-407. PubMed ID: 31215699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
