These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33217206)

  • 21. Genomic regions associated with tuber traits in tetraploid potatoes and identification of superior clones for breeding purposes.
    Pandey J; Scheuring DC; Koym JW; Vales MI
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():952263. PubMed ID: 35937326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.
    Ousmael KM; Cappa EP; Hansen JK; Hendre P; Hansen OK
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):9. PubMed ID: 38166623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of genomic breeding values for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in a multi-breed sheep population using a HD SNP chip.
    Brito LF; Clarke SM; McEwan JC; Miller SP; Pickering NK; Bain WE; Dodds KG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 28122512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genome-Based Genotype × Environment Prediction Enhances Potato (
    Ortiz R; Crossa J; Reslow F; Perez-Rodriguez P; Cuevas J
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():785196. PubMed ID: 35197995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Komen H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):64. PubMed ID: 31730478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the accuracy of genomic prediction of growth and wood traits in two Eucalyptus species and their F
    Tan B; Grattapaglia D; Martins GS; Ferreira KZ; Sundberg B; Ingvarsson PK
    BMC Plant Biol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):110. PubMed ID: 28662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early prediction of biomass in hybrid rye based on hyperspectral data surpasses genomic predictability in less-related breeding material.
    Galán RJ; Bernal-Vasquez AM; Jebsen C; Piepho HP; Thorwarth P; Steffan P; Gordillo A; Miedaner T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 May; 134(5):1409-1422. PubMed ID: 33630103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic selection for productive traits in biparental cassava breeding populations.
    Torres LG; Vilela de Resende MD; Azevedo CF; Fonseca E Silva F; de Oliveira EJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220245. PubMed ID: 31344109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus.
    Imai A; Kuniga T; Yoshioka T; Nonaka K; Mitani N; Fukamachi H; Hiehata N; Yamamoto M; Hayashi T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221880. PubMed ID: 31465502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.
    Li X; Zhang Z; Liu X; Chen Y
    Animal; 2019 Sep; 13(9):1804-1810. PubMed ID: 30616709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.
    Baller JL; Howard JT; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1534-1549. PubMed ID: 30721970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.