194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33217559)
1. Reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Paul M; Leeflang MM
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Mar; 27(3):311-314. PubMed ID: 33217559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann TC; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Tetzlaff JM; Akl EA; Brennan SE; Chou R; Glanville J; Grimshaw JM; Hróbjartsson A; Lalu MM; Li T; Loder EW; Mayo-Wilson E; McDonald S; McGuinness LA; Stewart LA; Thomas J; Tricco AC; Welch VA; Whiting P; Moher D
PLoS Med; 2021 Mar; 18(3):e1003583. PubMed ID: 33780438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of published studies: an overview and best practices.
Mandrekar JN; Mandrekar SJ
J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Aug; 6(8):1301-3. PubMed ID: 21847059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
Turpin DL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informative reporting of systematic reviews in radiology.
Bossuyt PM
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):313-4. PubMed ID: 24155281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Transparency in reporting observational studies: reflections after a year.
PLOS Medicine Editors
PLoS Med; 2015 Oct; 12(10):e1001896. PubMed ID: 26506432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):e1-34. PubMed ID: 19631507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(4):W65-94. PubMed ID: 19622512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some common, fatal flaws in systematic reviews of observational studies.
Wilkinson J; Stocking K
Fertil Steril; 2024 Jun; 121(6):918-920. PubMed ID: 38309515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration.
Welch V; Petticrew M; Petkovic J; Moher D; Waters E; White H; Tugwell P;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():68-89. PubMed ID: 26348799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research.
Murad MH; Wang Z
Evid Based Med; 2017 Aug; 22(4):139-142. PubMed ID: 28701372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
Page MJ; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting of systematic reviews: the challenge of genetic association studies.
Khoury MJ; Little J; Higgins J; Ioannidis JP; Gwinn M
PLoS Med; 2007 Jun; 4(6):e211. PubMed ID: 17593896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
Bias R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.
Knobloch K; Yoon U; Vogt PM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 21145753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancing the Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Vascular Surgery: PRISMA 2020.
Antoniou GA; Antoniou SA; Mani K
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 62(4):664-666. PubMed ID: 34334313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflict of interest in systematic reviews and its implications for public health policy.
Bhar RH; John D
Indian J Med Ethics; 2019; 4 (NS)(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 31791937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 1: introduction.
Noyes J; Booth A; Cargo M; Flemming K; Garside R; Hannes K; Harden A; Harris J; Lewin S; Pantoja T; Thomas J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():35-38. PubMed ID: 29242094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
