1123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33218292)
1. Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.
Gonzalez-Fernandez T; Tenorio AJ; Campbell KT; Silva EA; Leach JK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2021 Sep; 27(17-18):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 33218292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development, characterization and sterilisation of Nanocellulose-alginate-(hyaluronic acid)- bioinks and 3D bioprinted scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Lafuente-Merchan M; Ruiz-Alonso S; Espona-Noguera A; Galvez-Martin P; López-Ruiz E; Marchal JA; López-Donaire ML; Zabala A; Ciriza J; Saenz-Del-Burgo L; Pedraz JL
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Jul; 126():112160. PubMed ID: 34082965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional bioprinting of mesenchymal stem cells using an osteoinductive bioink containing alginate and BMP-2-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering.
Choe G; Lee M; Oh S; Seok JM; Kim J; Im S; Park SA; Lee JY
Biomater Adv; 2022 May; 136():212789. PubMed ID: 35929321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Egg white improves the biological properties of an alginate-methylcellulose bioink for 3D bioprinting of volumetric bone constructs.
Liu S; Kilian D; Ahlfeld T; Hu Q; Gelinsky M
Biofabrication; 2023 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 36735961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An osteogenic bioink composed of alginate, cellulose nanofibrils, and polydopamine nanoparticles for 3D bioprinting and bone tissue engineering.
Im S; Choe G; Seok JM; Yeo SJ; Lee JH; Kim WD; Lee JY; Park SA
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Apr; 205():520-529. PubMed ID: 35217077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alginate dependent changes of physical properties in 3D bioprinted cell-laden porous scaffolds affect cell viability and cell morphology.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Vetsch JR; Paul GR; Rubert M; Müller R
Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 14(6):065009. PubMed ID: 31426033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioprinting of alginate-carboxymethyl chitosan scaffolds for enamel tissue engineering
Mohabatpour F; Duan X; Yazdanpanah Z; Tabil XL; Lobanova L; Zhu N; Papagerakis S; Chen X; Papagerakis P
Biofabrication; 2022 Dec; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 36583240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Graphene oxide/alginate composites as novel bioinks for three-dimensional mesenchymal stem cell printing and bone regeneration applications.
Choe G; Oh S; Seok JM; Park SA; Lee JY
Nanoscale; 2019 Dec; 11(48):23275-23285. PubMed ID: 31782460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Manufacturing of self-standing multi-layered 3D-bioprinted alginate-hyaluronate constructs by controlling the cross-linking mechanisms for tissue engineering applications.
Janarthanan G; Kim JH; Kim I; Lee C; Chung EJ; Noh I
Biofabrication; 2022 May; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35504259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Silk Fibroin Enhances Cytocompatibilty and Dimensional Stability of Alginate Hydrogels for Light-Based Three-Dimensional Bioprinting.
Kim E; Seok JM; Bae SB; Park SA; Park WH
Biomacromolecules; 2021 May; 22(5):1921-1931. PubMed ID: 33840195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.
Deo KA; Singh KA; Peak CW; Alge DL; Gaharwar AK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 Mar; 26(5-6):318-338. PubMed ID: 32079490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.
Heid S; Boccaccini AR
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 113():1-22. PubMed ID: 32622053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GelMA/bioactive silica nanocomposite bioinks for stem cell osteogenic differentiation.
Tavares MT; Gaspar VM; Monteiro MV; S Farinha JP; Baleizão C; Mano JF
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33455952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wood-based nanocellulose and bioactive glass modified gelatin-alginate bioinks for 3D bioprinting of bone cells.
Ojansivu M; Rashad A; Ahlinder A; Massera J; Mishra A; Syverud K; Finne-Wistrand A; Miettinen S; Mustafa K
Biofabrication; 2019 Apr; 11(3):035010. PubMed ID: 30754034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.
Zhang J; Eyisoylu H; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():637-652. PubMed ID: 33326888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Printability of pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting.
Jessop ZM; Al-Sabah A; Gao N; Kyle S; Thomas B; Badiei N; Hawkins K; Whitaker IS
Biofabrication; 2019 Jul; 11(4):045006. PubMed ID: 30743252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An approach for mechanical property optimization of cell-laden alginate-gelatin composite bioink with bioactive glass nanoparticles.
Wei L; Li Z; Li J; Zhang Y; Yao B; Liu Y; Song W; Fu X; Wu X; Huang S
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2020 Nov; 31(11):103. PubMed ID: 33140191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell-Laden Nanocellulose/Chitosan-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Enhanced Osteogenic Cell Differentiation.
Maturavongsadit P; Narayanan LK; Chansoria P; Shirwaiker R; Benhabbour SR
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2021 Mar; 4(3):2342-2353. PubMed ID: 35014355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
