248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33218771)
1. Mercury bioaccumulation pathways in tusk (Brosme brosme) from Sognefjord, Norway: Insights from C and N isotopes.
Azad AM; Frantzen S; Bank MS; Madsen L; Maage A
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 269():115997. PubMed ID: 33218771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial distribution of mercury in seawater, sediment, and seafood from the Hardangerfjord ecosystem, Norway.
Azad AM; Frantzen S; Bank MS; Johnsen IA; Tessier E; Amouroux D; Madsen L; Maage A
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 667():622-637. PubMed ID: 30833261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioaccumulation of mercury and transcriptional responses in tusk (Brosme brosme), a deep-water fish from a Norwegian fjord.
Olsvik PA; Azad AM; Yadetie F
Chemosphere; 2021 Sep; 279():130588. PubMed ID: 33901891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracing Mercury Pollution along the Norwegian Coast via Elemental, Speciation, and Isotopic Analysis of Liver and Muscle Tissue of Deep-Water Marine Fish ( Brosme brosme).
Rua-Ibarz A; Bolea-Fernandez E; Maage A; Frantzen S; Sanden M; Vanhaecke F
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Feb; 53(4):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 30652479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stable isotope analyses revealed the influence of foraging habitat on mercury accumulation in tropical coastal marine fish.
Le Croizier G; Schaal G; Point D; Le Loc'h F; Machu E; Fall M; Munaron JM; Boyé A; Walter P; Laë R; Tito De Morais L
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 2):2129-2140. PubMed ID: 30290354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oligotrophy as a major driver of mercury bioaccumulation in medium-to high-trophic level consumers: A marine ecosystem-comparative study.
Chouvelon T; Cresson P; Bouchoucha M; Brach-Papa C; Bustamante P; Crochet S; Marco-Miralles F; Thomas B; Knoery J
Environ Pollut; 2018 Feb; 233():844-854. PubMed ID: 29149758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of geography and species variation on selenium and mercury molar ratios in Northeast Atlantic marine fish communities.
Azad AM; Frantzen S; Bank MS; Nilsen BM; Duinker A; Madsen L; Maage A
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():1482-1496. PubMed ID: 30586833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of a submerged meadow on uptake and trophic transfer of legacy mercury from contaminated sediment in the food web in a brackish Norwegian fjord.
Olsen M; Fjeld E; Lydersen E
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 654():209-217. PubMed ID: 30445322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mercury contamination in deep-water fish: transcriptional responses in tusk (Brosme brosme) from a fjord gradient.
Olsvik PA; Lindgren M; Maage A
Aquat Toxicol; 2013 Nov; 144-145():172-85. PubMed ID: 24184472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ecological drivers of mercury concentrations in fish species in subsistence harvests from Kotzebue Sound, Alaska.
Cyr AP; López JA; Wooller MJ; Whiting A; Gerlach R; O'Hara T
Environ Res; 2019 Oct; 177():108622. PubMed ID: 31419713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Food sources are more important than biomagnification on mercury bioaccumulation in marine fishes.
Yoshino K; Mori K; Kanaya G; Kojima S; Henmi Y; Matsuyama A; Yamamoto M
Environ Pollut; 2020 Jul; 262():113982. PubMed ID: 32146359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ecology and environmental characteristics influence methylmercury bioaccumulation in coastal invertebrates.
Bradford MA; Mallory ML; O'Driscoll NJ
Chemosphere; 2024 Jan; 346():140502. PubMed ID: 37866498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An examination of the factors influencing the bioaccumulation of methylmercury at the base of the estuarine food web.
Mason RP; Buckman KL; Seelen EA; Taylor VF; Chen CY
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Aug; 886():163996. PubMed ID: 37164101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mercury bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in sympatric snapper species from the Gulf of Mexico.
Bank MS; Chesney E; Shine JP; Maage A; Senn DB
Ecol Appl; 2007 Oct; 17(7):2100-10. PubMed ID: 17974344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter-species differences of total mercury and methylmercury in farmed fish in Southern China: Does feed matter?
Li W; Wang WX
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 651(Pt 2):1857-1866. PubMed ID: 30317173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nitrogen and sulfur isotopes predict variation in mercury levels in Arctic seabird prey.
Góngora E; Braune BM; Elliott KH
Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Oct; 135():907-914. PubMed ID: 30301115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mercury isotope variations within the marine food web of Chinese Bohai Sea: Implications for mercury sources and biogeochemical cycling.
Meng M; Sun RY; Liu HW; Yu B; Yin YG; Hu LG; Chen JB; Shi JB; Jiang GB
J Hazard Mater; 2020 Feb; 384():121379. PubMed ID: 31611019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of dietary carbon on mercury bioaccumulation in streams of the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, USA.
Riva-Murray K; Bradley PM; Chasar LC; Button DT; Brigham ME; Scudder Eikenberry BC; Journey CA; Lutz MA
Ecotoxicology; 2013 Jan; 22(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 23099811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mercury and methylmercury bioaccumulation by polychaete worms is governed by both feeding ecology and mercury bioavailability in coastal mudflats.
Sizmur T; Canário J; Gerwing TG; Mallory ML; O'Driscoll NJ
Environ Pollut; 2013 May; 176():18-25. PubMed ID: 23395989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Drivers of variability in mercury and methylmercury bioaccumulation and biomagnification in temperate freshwater lakes.
Gentès S; Löhrer B; Legeay A; Mazel AF; Anschutz P; Charbonnier C; Tessier E; Maury-Brachet R
Chemosphere; 2021 Mar; 267():128890. PubMed ID: 33248739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
