137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33218825)
21. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma in thin core biopsies using TROG 03.04 'RADAR' trial clinical data.
Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Steigler A; Murray JD; Atkinson C; Matthews J; Duchesne G; Spry NA; Christie D; Joseph D; Attia J; Denham JW
Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26325671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].
Kristiansen G; Egevad L; Amin M; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA; Epstein JI;
Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26809207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Highlights in advanced prostate cancer from the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 20 Suppl 8(4):1-24. PubMed ID: 35579592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.
Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H
Pathol Int; 2019 Feb; 69(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 30694570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Serum Vitamin D is Not Helpful for Predicting Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Compared with the Prostate Health Index.
Stephan C; Lein M; Matalon J; Kilic E; Zhao Z; Busch J; Jung K
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):709-14. PubMed ID: 26976204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inverse Association of Prostatic Chronic Inflammation among Prostate Cancer Tumor Grade Groups: Retrospective Study of 738 Consecutive Cases Elected to a First Random Biopsy Set.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Novella G; Sebben M; Mariotto A; Inverardi D; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Brunelli M; Balzarro M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2018; 100(4):456-462. PubMed ID: 29672311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading of Prostate Cancer.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KR; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Jun; 40(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 27023325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Molecular Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline.
Eggener SE; Rumble RB; Armstrong AJ; Morgan TM; Crispino T; Cornford P; van der Kwast T; Grignon DJ; Rai AJ; Agarwal N; Klein EA; Den RB; Beltran H
J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 38(13):1474-1494. PubMed ID: 31829902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Eight Endorsements of the International Society of Urological Pathology from the 2019 Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Iczkowski KA; van Leenders GJLH
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 32897768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.
Offermann A; Hohensteiner S; Kuempers C; Ribbat-Idel J; Schneider F; Becker F; Hupe MC; Duensing S; Merseburger AS; Kirfel J; Reischl M; Lubczyk V; Kuefer R; Perner S
Front Med (Lausanne); 2017; 4():157. PubMed ID: 29034236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) lowers apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values among intermediate risk prostate cancers.
Currin S; Flood TA; Krishna S; Ansari A; McInnes MDF; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 50(1):279-287. PubMed ID: 30585372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate cancer glands with cribriform architecture and with glomeruloid features should be considered as Gleason pattern 4 and not pattern 3.
Minardi D; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Massari F; Ciccarese C; Lopez-Beltran A; Cheng L; Montironi R
Future Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(12):1431-3. PubMed ID: 27189718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
