These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33219589)
1. A comparative questionnaire study of patient complaint levels between magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler (Cavitron Ikeda Y; Kawada A; Tanaka D; Ikeda E; Kobayashi H; Iwata T Int J Dent Hyg; 2021 Aug; 19(3):273-278. PubMed ID: 33219589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised controlled trial to determine patient experience of a magnetostrictive stack scaler as compared to a piezoelectric scaler, in supportive periodontal therapy. Daly S; Newcombe RG; Claydon NCA; Seong J; Davies M; West NX J Dent; 2020 Feb; 93():103279. PubMed ID: 31931025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' perception of pain during ultrasonic debridement: a comparison between piezoelectric and magnetostrictive scalers. Muhney KA; Dechow PC J Dent Hyg; 2010; 84(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 21047464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Efficacy of subgingival scaling of the molars with conventional scalers in vitro]. Chen MH; Yin YZ Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2017 Feb; 26(1):54-58. PubMed ID: 28474067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study. Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one? Drisko CH Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers. Drisko CL Curr Opin Periodontol; 1993; ():78-88. PubMed ID: 8401851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. Drisko CL; Cochran DL; Blieden T; Bouwsma OJ; Cohen RE; Damoulis P; Fine JB; Greenstein G; Hinrichs J; Somerman MJ; Iacono V; Genco RJ; J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1792-801. PubMed ID: 11128930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effects of four different power scalers on enamel tooth surface in the dog. Brine EJ; Marretta SM; Pijanowski GJ; Siegel AM J Vet Dent; 2000 Mar; 17(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11968928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Periodontal healing after scaling and root planing with the Kavo Sonicflex and Titan-S sonic scalers. Laurell L Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 2255995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]