These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33220652)

  • 21. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revisiting the automaticity of reading: Electrophysiological recordings show that stroop words capture spatial attention.
    Lowery A; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 35913878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Augst S; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():8-15. PubMed ID: 24904999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automaticity and word perception: evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects.
    Brown TL; Roos-Gilbert L; Carr TH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Nov; 21(6):1395-411. PubMed ID: 7490574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resting Stroop task: Evidence of task conflict in trials with no required response.
    Hershman R; Dadon G; Kiesel A; Henik A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):353-360. PubMed ID: 37620635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1619-29. PubMed ID: 24958685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Presentation of multiple task instructional sets impacts auditory Stroop performance during dual task locomotion.
    Pitman J; Kissack B; Vallis LA
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Oct; 242(10):2357-2365. PubMed ID: 39110163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.
    David IA; Volchan E; Vila J; Keil A; de Oliveira L; Faria-Júnior AJ; Perakakis P; Dias EC; Mocaiber I; Pereira MG; Machado-Pinheiro W
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 21161193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stroop effects in Alzheimer's disease: selective attention speed of processing, or color-naming? A meta-analysis.
    Ben-David BM; Tewari A; Shakuf V; Van Lieshout PH
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2014; 38(4):923-38. PubMed ID: 24100125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task.
    Sugg MJ; McDonald JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Jun; 20(3):647-75. PubMed ID: 8027716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict.
    Hershman R; Levin Y; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1084-1092. PubMed ID: 32170401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A; Abdel Rahman R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stroop dilution revisited: evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing.
    Roberts MA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15709859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence accumulation in the integrated and primed Stroop tasks.
    Kinoshita S; de Wit B; Aji M; Norris D
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):824-836. PubMed ID: 28364405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.