These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33220652)
41. Effects of Stroop interference on categorical perception in simultaneous color discrimination. Suegami T; Michimata C Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 1):857-78. PubMed ID: 20681338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An ERP investigation of the working memory stroop effect. Wang W; Qi M; Gao H Neuropsychologia; 2021 Feb; 152():107752. PubMed ID: 33453265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters. Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Attentional constraints on semantic activation: Evidence from Stroop's paradigm. White D; Besner D Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():4-11. PubMed ID: 27594342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A controlled approach to the emotional dilution of the Stroop effect. Fackrell K; Edmondson-Jones M; Hall DA PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80141. PubMed ID: 24223219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance. Roelofs A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Stroop effects in persons with traumatic brain injury: selective attention, speed of processing, or color-naming? A meta-analysis. Ben-David BM; Nguyen LL; van Lieshout PH J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 Mar; 17(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21320377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. To group or not to group: an ecological consideration of the stroop effect. Reynolds M; Kwan D; Smilek D Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 20371427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals. Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The Stroop effect and mental imagery. Nanay B Perception; 2024 Jan; 53(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 37946455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course. Roelofs A Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Dunbar K; MacLeod CM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Does Posture Influence the Stroop Effect? Caron EE; Reynolds MG; Ralph BCW; Carriere JSA; Besner D; Smilek D Psychol Sci; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1452-1460. PubMed ID: 33017261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Interference in the Stroop color-naming task]. Yamazaki A Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1985 Oct; 56(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 4094196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks. Rey-Mermet A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Depth of processing in the stroop task: evidence from a novel forced-reading condition. Eidels A; Ryan K; Williams P; Algom D Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 24836124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Modulations of the executive control network by stimulus onset asynchrony in a Stroop task. Coderre EL; van Heuven WJ BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 14():79. PubMed ID: 23902451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A reach-to-touch investigation on the nature of reading in the Stroop task. Tillman G; Eidels A; Finkbeiner M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2547-2557. PubMed ID: 27549606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Semantic picture-word interference is a postperceptual effect. Schnur TT; Martin R Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 22215465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Two distinct patterns of interference in between-attribute Stroop matching tasks. Dittrich K; Stahl C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):563-581. PubMed ID: 27981523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]