154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33221287)
1. Uptake, Persistence, and Performance of Weekly Home Monitoring of Visual Field in a Large Cohort of Patients With Glaucoma.
Prea SM; Kong GYX; Guymer RH; Vingrys AJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 223():286-295. PubMed ID: 33221287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.
Pham AT; Ramulu PY; Boland MV; Yohannan J
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1417-1425. PubMed ID: 33798655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients.
Prea SM; Vingrys AJ; Kong GYX
J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(15):. PubMed ID: 35893408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Home Monitoring Allow Earlier Detection of Rapid Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma?
Anderson AJ; Bedggood PA; George Kong YX; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
Ophthalmology; 2017 Dec; 124(12):1735-1742. PubMed ID: 28764889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL
J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Prea SM; Kong YXG; Mehta A; He M; Crowston JG; Gupta V; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
Gupta V; Kong GXY; Singh A; Panigrahi A; Gupta S; Prea S; Vingrys AJ
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shimizu K
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25563. PubMed ID: 27149561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma.
Ishibashi M; Matsumoto C; Hashimoto S; Eura M; Okuyama S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Kayazawa T; Numata T; Kusaka S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 103(11):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 30636206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.
Rabiolo A; Morales E; Kim JH; Afifi AA; Yu F; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2020 Jun; 127(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 31952885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months.
Jones PR; Campbell P; Callaghan T; Jones L; Asfaw DS; Edgar DF; Crabb DP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 223():42-52. PubMed ID: 32882222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acceptability of a home-based visual field test (Eyecatcher) for glaucoma home monitoring: a qualitative study of patients' views and experiences.
Jones L; Callaghan T; Campbell P; Jones PR; Taylor DJ; Asfaw DS; Edgar DF; Crabb DP
BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e043130. PubMed ID: 33820785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Association Between Visual Field Reliability Indices and Cognitive Impairment in Glaucoma Patients.
Raman P; Khy Ching Y; Sivagurunathan PD; Ramli N; Mohd Khalid KH
J Glaucoma; 2019 Aug; 28(8):685-690. PubMed ID: 31033782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.
Thulasidas M; Patyal S
J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Test Conditions in Macular Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma.
Eura M; Matsumoto C; Hashimoto S; Okuyama S; Takada S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 29045331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?
Kelly SR; Bryan SR; Crabb DP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 97(6):e833-e838. PubMed ID: 30801992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
