These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33222993)

  • 21. Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future.
    Sogani J; Mango VL; Keating D; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Jan; 69():269-279. PubMed ID: 33032103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Brief communication: The current status of contrast-enhanced mammography in breast imaging.
    Savaria D; Kaushik C
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Sep; 113():110213. PubMed ID: 38852214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges.
    van Nijnatten TJA; Morscheid S; Baltzer PAT; Clauser P; Alcantara R; Kuhl CK; Wildberger JE
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 171():111312. PubMed ID: 38237520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of contrast-enhanced mammogram as an adjunct to tomosynthesis in evaluation of circumscribed breast lesions.
    Porkodi D; Devimeenal J
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Oct; 97(1162):1696-1705. PubMed ID: 39024041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Açar ÇR; Orguc S
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Aug; 24(6):481-493. PubMed ID: 38777678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees AV
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Radiomics Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes.
    Zhu S; Wang S; Guo S; Wu R; Zhang J; Kong M; Pan L; Gu Y; Yu S
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):2228-2238. PubMed ID: 38142176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shahraki Z; Ghaffari M; Nakhaie Moghadam M; Parooie F; Salarzaei M
    Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 35754256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Fischer U; Diekmann F; Helbich T; Preibsch H; Püsken M; Wenkel E; Wienbeck S; Fallenberg EM
    Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 63(12):916-924. PubMed ID: 37889284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network.
    Qian N; Jiang W; Guo Y; Zhu J; Qiu J; Yu H; Huang X
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):917-927. PubMed ID: 37610440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol.
    Calabrò N; Abruzzese F; Valentini E; Gambaro ACL; Attanasio S; Cannillo B; Brambilla M; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2024 Jul; 129(7):989-998. PubMed ID: 38987501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associations with breast density and patient's characteristics.
    Magni V; Cozzi A; Muscogiuri G; Benedek A; Rossini G; Fanizza M; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
    Radiol Med; 2024 Sep; 129(9):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 39060886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Covington MF; Salmon S; Weaver BD; Fajardo LL
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 97(1156):695-704. PubMed ID: 38374651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrast enhanced mammography: focus on frequently encountered benign and malignant diagnoses.
    Yang ML; Bhimani C; Roth R; Germaine P
    Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36691077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review.
    Patel BK; Lobbes MBI; Lewin J
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2018 Feb; 39(1):70-79. PubMed ID: 29317041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast Tomosynthesis: Practical Considerations.
    Friedewald SM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 28411675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.