These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33222993)
41. Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer. Berg WA; Bandos AI; Sava MG J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Aug; 20(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 37394083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Imaging Preferences in Women With a History of Breast Cancer Receiving Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Moravia LP; Mosaddhegi J; Mehta TS; Qureshi MM; Phillips J J Breast Imaging; 2023 Nov; 5(6):685-694. PubMed ID: 38141234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. Monreal S Radiol Technol; 2018 May; 89(5):518-520. PubMed ID: 29793915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Current use and future perspectives of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM): a survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI). Schiaffino S; Cozzi A; Clauser P; Giannotti E; Marino MA; van Nijnatten TJA; Baltzer PAT; Lobbes MBI; Mann RM; Pinker K; Fuchsjäger MH; Pijnappel RM; Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5439-5450. PubMed ID: 38227202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art. Jochelson MS; Lobbes MBI Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 33650905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Phase contrast imaging of the breast. Basic principles and steps towards clinical implementation]. Grandl S; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Auweter SD; Hellerhoff K Radiologe; 2014 Mar; 54(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 24623010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions. Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography After Cryoablation of Breast Cancer. Corines MJ; Sogani J; Hogan MP; Mango VL; Bryce Y AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Feb; 222(2):e2330250. PubMed ID: 38019473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: II. Artefacts/uniformity, exposure time and phantom-based dosimetry. Marshall NW; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37820686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Gluskin J; Click M; Fleischman R; Dromain C; Morris EA; Jochelson MS Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():147-154. PubMed ID: 28987661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for suspicious findings in dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lin ST; Li HJ; Li YZ; Chen QQ; Ye JY; Lin S; Cai SQ; Sun JG Cancer Med; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e7128. PubMed ID: 38659408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]