BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33223495)

  • 1. Resting EEG theta connectivity and alpha power to predict repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation response in depression: A non-replication from the ICON-DB consortium.
    Bailey NW; Krepel N; van Dijk H; Leuchter AF; Vila-Rodriguez F; Blumberger DM; Downar J; Wilson A; Daskalakis ZJ; Carpenter LL; Corlier J; Arns M; Fitzgerald PB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Feb; 132(2):650-659. PubMed ID: 33223495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiating responders and non-responders to rTMS treatment for depression after one week using resting EEG connectivity measures.
    Bailey NW; Hoy KE; Rogasch NC; Thomson RH; McQueen S; Elliot D; Sullivan CM; Fulcher BD; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
    J Affect Disord; 2019 Jan; 242():68-79. PubMed ID: 30172227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responders to rTMS for depression show increased fronto-midline theta and theta connectivity compared to non-responders.
    Bailey NW; Hoy KE; Rogasch NC; Thomson RH; McQueen S; Elliot D; Sullivan CM; Fulcher BD; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 29128490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual alpha frequency proximity associated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation outcome: An independent replication study from the ICON-DB consortium.
    Roelofs CL; Krepel N; Corlier J; Carpenter LL; Fitzgerald PB; Daskalakis ZJ; Tendolkar I; Wilson A; Downar J; Bailey NW; Blumberger DM; Vila-Rodriguez F; Leuchter AF; Arns M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Feb; 132(2):643-649. PubMed ID: 33243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QEEG Theta Cordance in the Prediction of Treatment Outcome to Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation or Venlafaxine ER in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.
    Bares M; Brunovsky M; Novak T; Kopecek M; Stopkova P; Sos P; Höschl C
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 46(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 24711613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Change in Quantitative EEG Theta Cordance as a Potential Predictor of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Clinical Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder.
    Hunter AM; Nghiem TX; Cook IA; Krantz DE; Minzenberg MJ; Leuchter AF
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 49(5):306-315. PubMed ID: 29224411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resting-state EEG connectivity recorded before and after rTMS treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression.
    Godfrey K; Muthukumaraswamy SD; Stinear CM; Hoeh NR
    Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging; 2024 Mar; 338():111767. PubMed ID: 38183848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) and 10-Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Bulteau S; Sébille V; Fayet G; Thomas-Ollivier V; Deschamps T; Bonnin-Rivalland A; Laforgue E; Pichot A; Valrivière P; Auffray-Calvier E; Fortin J; Péréon Y; Vanelle JM; Sauvaget A
    Trials; 2017 Jan; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 28086851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potentiation of quantitative electroencephalograms following prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with major depression.
    Noda Y; Nakamura M; Saeki T; Inoue M; Iwanari H; Kasai K
    Neurosci Res; 2013; 77(1-2):70-7. PubMed ID: 23827366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-linear processing and reinforcement learning to predict rTMS treatment response in depression.
    Ebrahimzadeh E; Dehghani A; Asgarinejad M; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging; 2024 Jan; 337():111764. PubMed ID: 38043370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of antidepressant responses to non-invasive brain stimulation using frontal electroencephalogram signals: Cross-dataset comparisons and validation.
    Li CT; Chen CS; Cheng CM; Chen CP; Chen JP; Chen MH; Bai YM; Tsai SJ
    J Affect Disord; 2023 Dec; 343():86-95. PubMed ID: 37579885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An effective brain connectivity technique to predict repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation outcome for major depressive disorder patients using EEG signals.
    Nobakhsh B; Shalbaf A; Rostami R; Kazemi R; Rezaei E; Shalbaf R
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 46(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 36445618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resting electroencephalographic correlates of the clinical response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A preliminary comparison between unipolar and bipolar depression.
    Woźniak-Kwaśniewska A; Szekely D; Harquel S; Bougerol T; David O
    J Affect Disord; 2015 Sep; 183():15-21. PubMed ID: 25997170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced theta-gamma coupling associated with hippocampal volume increase following high-frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with major depression.
    Noda Y; Zomorrodi R; Daskalakis ZJ; Blumberger DM; Nakamura M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Nov; 133():169-174. PubMed ID: 30318052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of rTMS treatment response in major depressive disorder using machine learning techniques and nonlinear features of EEG signal.
    Hasanzadeh F; Mohebbi M; Rostami R
    J Affect Disord; 2019 Sep; 256():132-142. PubMed ID: 31176185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subgenual cingulate theta activity predicts treatment response of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in participants with vascular depression.
    Narushima K; McCormick LM; Yamada T; Thatcher RW; Robinson RG
    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2010; 22(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 20160213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Baseline Difference in Quantitative Electroencephalography Variables Between Responders and Non-Responders to Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression.
    Vlcek P; Bares M; Novak T; Brunovsky M
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():83. PubMed ID: 32174854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resting State Dense Array Gamma Oscillatory Activity as a Response Marker for Cerebellar-Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Schizophrenia.
    Tikka SK; Garg S; Sinha VK; Nizamie SH; Goyal N
    J ECT; 2015 Dec; 31(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 25923998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Blumberger DM; Vila-Rodriguez F; Thorpe KE; Feffer K; Noda Y; Giacobbe P; Knyahnytska Y; Kennedy SH; Lam RW; Daskalakis ZJ; Downar J
    Lancet; 2018 Apr; 391(10131):1683-1692. PubMed ID: 29726344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting treatment response using EEG in major depressive disorder: A machine-learning meta-analysis.
    Watts D; Pulice RF; Reilly J; Brunoni AR; Kapczinski F; Passos IC
    Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Aug; 12(1):332. PubMed ID: 35961967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.