These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Respiration-dependent ventricular pacing compared with fixed ventricular and atrial-ventricular synchronous pacing: aerobic and hemodynamic variables. Rossi P; Rognoni G; Occhetta E; Aina F; Prando MD; Plicchi G; Minella M J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 4031276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of rate responsive pacing on exercise performance in the postoperative univentricular heart. Paridon SM; Karpawich PP; Pinsky WW Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1256-62. PubMed ID: 7686655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative functional effects of chronic ventricular demand and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Yee R; Benditt DG; Kostuk WJ; Ko PT; Purves P; Klein GJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan; 7(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 6199764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics. Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physiological importance of different atrioventricular intervals to improved exercise performance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers. Haskell RJ; French WJ Br Heart J; 1989 Jan; 61(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 2917098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with Sensolog 703: a new activity sensing rate responsive pacemaker. Lau CP; Tse WS; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1444-55. PubMed ID: 2462222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of ventricular rate responsive pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block. Ragonese P; Guccione P; Drago F; Turchetta A; Calzolari A; Formigari R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):603-10. PubMed ID: 7516544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adequacy of pacing rate during exercise in rate responsive ventricular pacing. Hasegawa A; Hatori M; Amano M; Iijima T; Adachi H; Yamaguchi E; Fukuda T; Murata K; Nagai R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 1):307-12. PubMed ID: 9058868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block. Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial clinical experience with a minute ventilation sensing rate modulated pacemaker: improvements in exercise capacity and symptomatology. Lau CP; Antoniou A; Ward DE; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1815-22. PubMed ID: 2463552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefit of single setting rate responsive ventricular pacing compared with fixed rate demand pacing in elderly patients. Gammage M; Schofield S; Rankin I; Bennett M; Coles P; Pentecost B Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 1):174-80. PubMed ID: 1706502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block. Oldroyd KG; Rae AP; Carter R; Wingate C; Cobbe SM Br Heart J; 1991 Apr; 65(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 1827588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physiological benefits of a pacemaker with dual chamber pacing at low heart rates and single chamber rate responsive pacing during exercise. French WJ; Haskell RJ; Wesley GW; Florio J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1840-5. PubMed ID: 2463556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical work capacity with rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) versus dual chamber pacing (DDD) in patients with normal and diminished left ventricular function. Frielingsdorf J; Dür P; Gerber AE; Vuilliomenet A; Bertel O Int J Cardiol; 1995 May; 49(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 7649670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A double-blind study of submaximal exercise tolerance and variation in paced rate in atrial synchronous compared to activity sensor modulated ventricular pacing. Linde-Edelstam C; Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK; Rydén L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jun; 15(6):905-15. PubMed ID: 1376903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block. Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR]. Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate-responsive pacing by means of activity sensing versus single rate ventricular pacing: a double-blind cross-over study. Smedgård P; Kristensson BE; Kruse I; Ryden L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jul; 10(4 Pt 1):902-15. PubMed ID: 2441374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]