These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33223647)
1. Novel bioactive caries-detecting dye solution: Cytotoxicity, antimicrobial activity, scanning electron microscope, and stereomicroscopic analysis in diagnosis of dental caries. Shashirekha G; Jena A; Mohanty N; Kamilla SK J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 33223647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analyzing working time and efficient caries removal using a novel bioactive caries detecting dye and air polisher prophy for caries excavation: randomised clinical trial. Govind S; Jena A; Kamilla SK; Mohanty N; Kader MA; Luke AM; Alessa NA; Assiry AA; Karobari MI Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(4):214. PubMed ID: 38485869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of Caries Removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in Primary Molars: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. Prabhakar A; Lokeshwari M; Naik SV; Yavagal C Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(4):323-329. PubMed ID: 30397377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SEM Analysis of Residual Dentin Surface in Primary Teeth Using Different Chemomechanical Caries Removal Agents. Thakur R; Patil SDS; Kush A; Madhu K J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(4):289-293. PubMed ID: 28650784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: An in vitro study. Sahana S; Vasa AA; Geddam D; Reddy VK; Nalluri S; Velagapudi N J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Apr; 6(Suppl 1):S17-22. PubMed ID: 27195222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Gulzar S; Arora R; Shah AH; Bhardwaj B; Abusalim G; Khalil HS; Wyne AH J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 27965492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain). Chittem J; Sajjan GS; Varma KM J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 26430299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An Inamdar MS; Chole DG; Bakle SS; Gandhi NP; Hatte NR; Rao MP J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 33384489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An Aswathi KK; Rani SP; Athimuthu A; Prasanna P; Patil P; Deepali KJ J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 28139476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: A comparative in vivo study. Kumar KVKS; Prasad MG; Sandeep RV; Reddy SP; Divya D; Pratyusha K Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 27403059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study. Ramamoorthi S; Nivedhitha MS; Vanajassun PP J Conserv Dent; 2013 Sep; 16(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 24082572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of cecropin-XJ on growth and adherence of oral cariogenic bacteria in vitro. Hao YQ; Zhou XD; Xiao XR; Lu JJ; Zhang FC; Hu T; Wu HK; Chen XM Chin Med J (Engl); 2005 Jan; 118(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 15667802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of two minimally invasive caries removal techniques on fracture resistance of the teeth restored with composite: An SEM study. Kittur M; Ghivari S; Pujar M J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(2):204-208. PubMed ID: 34759591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Smear Layer Formation After Caries Removal Using Erbium Laser and Papain-Based Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal Agent: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. Dhanvijay A; Kubde R; Shenoi P; Badole G; Shahu S Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e47999. PubMed ID: 38034221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disinfection of Cariogenic Pathogens in Planktonic Lifestyle, Biofilm and Carious Dentine with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy. Wu M; Xu L; Cai Z; Huang S; Li Y; Lei L; Huang X Photochem Photobiol; 2020 Jan; 96(1):170-177. PubMed ID: 31483869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of laser fluorescence for residual caries detection in primary teeth. Gurbuz T; Yilmaz Y; Sengul F Eur J Dent; 2008 Jul; 2(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 19212544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antimicrobial Activity of Peganum Harmala L. on Streptococcus mutans Compared to 0.2% Chlorhexidine. Motamedifar M; Khosropanah H; Dabiri S J Dent (Shiraz); 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 27602397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel Management of Hypersensitive Dentin Using Propolis-based Herbal Desensitizing Agents: An Murugesan S; Kumar P; Reddy BN; Arumugam K; Mohankumar P; Chandrasekaran K J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1030-1034. PubMed ID: 35000948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentin Topographic Features following Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Teeth. Kotb RM; Elkateb MA; Ahmed AM; Kawana KY; El Meligy OA J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 27805895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]