These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33225433)

  • 1. Insurance Payer Status Predicts Postoperative Speech Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Miller SE; Anderson C; Manning J; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Oct; 31(9):666-673. PubMed ID: 33225433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits of a Hearing Registry: Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Quiet Versus Noise in 1,611 Patients.
    Dunn C; Miller SE; Schafer EC; Silva C; Gifford RH; Grisel JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):851-861. PubMed ID: 32966101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiometric Profile of Cochlear Implant Recipients Demonstrates Need for Revising Insurance Coverage.
    Barnes JH; Yin LX; Marinelli JP; Carlson ML
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun; 131(6):E2007-E. PubMed ID: 33347621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Zhang E; Coelho DH
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.
    Park E; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):637-43. PubMed ID: 22212763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delaying Cochlear Implantation Impacts Postoperative Speech Perception of Nontraditional Pediatric Candidates.
    Park LR; Perkins EL; Woodard JS; Brown KD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(3):182-187. PubMed ID: 33352551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception outcome in multiply disabled children following cochlear implantation: investigating a predictive score.
    Trimble K; Rosella LC; Propst E; Gordon KA; Papaioannou V; Papsin BC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Sep; 19(8):602-11; quiz 651. PubMed ID: 19323352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
    Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for the expansion of pediatric cochlear implant candidacy.
    Carlson ML; Sladen DP; Haynes DS; Driscoll CL; DeJong MD; Erickson HC; Sunderhaus LW; Hedley-Williams A; Rosenzweig EA; Davis TJ; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 25275867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Speech Performance in Bimodal versus Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Sturm JJ; Kuhlmey M; Alexiades G; Hoffman R; Kim AH
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Apr; 131(4):E1322-E1327. PubMed ID: 32876332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
    Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):324-334. PubMed ID: 28793847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise.
    Gifford RH; Revit LJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.