These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception outcome in multiply disabled children following cochlear implantation: investigating a predictive score. Trimble K; Rosella LC; Propst E; Gordon KA; Papaioannou V; Papsin BC J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Sep; 19(8):602-11; quiz 651. PubMed ID: 19323352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants. Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing. Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Speech Performance in Bimodal versus Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. Sturm JJ; Kuhlmey M; Alexiades G; Hoffman R; Kim AH Laryngoscope; 2021 Apr; 131(4):E1322-E1327. PubMed ID: 32876332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients. Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):324-334. PubMed ID: 28793847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Gifford RH; Revit LJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]