402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33225533)
21. An efficient method for high molecular weight bacterial DNA extraction suitable for shotgun metagenomics from skin swabs.
Serghiou IR; Baker D; Evans R; Dalby MJ; Kiu R; Trampari E; Phillips S; Watt R; Atkinson T; Murphy B; Hall LJ; Webber MA
Microb Genom; 2023 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 37428148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A specific combination of dual index adaptors decreases the sensitivity of amplicon sequencing with the Illumina platform.
Hirose Y; Shiozaki T; Hamano I; Yoshihara S; Tokumoto H; Eki T; Harada N
DNA Res; 2020 Aug; 27(4):. PubMed ID: 32810209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies.
Yang F; Sun J; Luo H; Ren H; Zhou H; Lin Y; Han M; Chen B; Liao H; Brix S; Li J; Yang H; Kristiansen K; Zhong H
Gigascience; 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32657325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diazotroph Community Characterization via a High-Throughput
Gaby JC; Rishishwar L; Valderrama-Aguirre LC; Green SJ; Valderrama-Aguirre A; Jordan IK; Kostka JE
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Feb; 84(4):. PubMed ID: 29180374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High throughput method of 16S rRNA gene sequencing library preparation for plant root microbial community profiling.
Kumaishi K; Usui E; Suzuki K; Kobori S; Sato T; Toda Y; Takanashi H; Shinozaki S; Noda M; Takakura A; Matsumoto K; Yamasaki Y; Tsujimoto H; Iwata H; Ichihashi Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19289. PubMed ID: 36369356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols.
Lim Y; Totsika M; Morrison M; Punyadeera C
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):8523. PubMed ID: 28819242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Processing human urine and ureteral stents for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
Al KF; Burton JP
STAR Protoc; 2021 Jun; 2(2):100435. PubMed ID: 33899017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of DNA extraction kits and phylogenetic diversity of the porcine gastrointestinal tract based on Illumina sequencing of two hypervariable regions.
Burbach K; Seifert J; Pieper DH; Camarinha-Silva A
Microbiologyopen; 2016 Feb; 5(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 26541370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microbiota Analysis Using Sequencing by Synthesis: From Library Preparation to Sequencing.
Nelson A; Stewart CJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2121():165-184. PubMed ID: 32147795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing saliva microbiome collection and processing methods.
Armstrong AJS; Parmar V; Blaser MJ
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2021 Nov; 7(1):81. PubMed ID: 34795298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Making and Sequencing Heavily Multiplexed, High-Throughput 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicon Libraries Using a Flexible, Two-Stage PCR Protocol.
Naqib A; Poggi S; Wang W; Hyde M; Kunstman K; Green SJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1783():149-169. PubMed ID: 29767361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The newest Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 full-length 16S rRNA sequencing enables the accurate resolution of species-level microbial community profiling.
Zhang T; Li H; Ma S; Cao J; Liao H; Huang Q; Chen W
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 Oct; 89(10):e0060523. PubMed ID: 37800969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.
Ariefdjohan MW; Savaiano DA; Nakatsu CH
Nutr J; 2010 May; 9():23. PubMed ID: 20492702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome.
Karstens L; Siddiqui NY; Zaza T; Barstad A; Amundsen CL; Sysoeva TA
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6186. PubMed ID: 33731788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of Microorganisms in Body Fluid Samples.
Ji X; Ni S; Tian G; Zhang L; Wang W
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2695():73-88. PubMed ID: 37450112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applications.
Gerasimidis K; Bertz M; Quince C; Brunner K; Bruce A; Combet E; Calus S; Loman N; Ijaz UZ
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():365. PubMed ID: 27456340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing.
Ranjan R; Rani A; Metwally A; McGee HS; Perkins DL
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Jan; 469(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 26718401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
