These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33226285)

  • 21. Readability Assessment of Patient Information about Lymphedema and Its Treatment.
    Seth AK; Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Feb; 137(2):287e-295e. PubMed ID: 26818318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.
    Kocyigit BF; Koca TT; Akaltun MS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 31372852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.
    Piñero-López MÁ; Modamio P; Lastra CF; Mariño EL
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e100. PubMed ID: 27226241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Readability assessment of patient education materials on major otolaryngology association websites.
    Eloy JA; Li S; Kasabwala K; Agarwal N; Hansberry DR; Baredes S; Setzen M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 22864405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
    De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?
    Miles RC; Choi P; Baird GL; Dibble EH; Lamb L; Garg M; Lehman C
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 31839567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Veterinary allergy information has lower health readability than human allergy information: a comparative analysis of allergy education materials for pets and people.
    Tater KC
    Vet Dermatol; 2021 Apr; 32(2):144-e33. PubMed ID: 33403713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.
    Ng MK; Mont MA; Piuzzi NS
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):647-651.e2. PubMed ID: 31678019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.
    Correa DJ; Milano L; Kwon CS; Jetté N; Dlugos D; Harte-Hargrove L; Pugh MJ; Smith JK; Moshé SL
    Epilepsia; 2020 Mar; 61(3):528-538. PubMed ID: 32096225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is the Internet a Suitable Patient Resource for Information on Common Radiological Investigations?: Radiology-Related Information on the Internet.
    Bowden DJ; Yap LC; Sheppard DG
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):826-830. PubMed ID: 28216191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
    Alamoudi U; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Disparities between English and Spanish in readability of online endodontic information for laypeople.
    Miguéns-Vila R; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Rodríguez-Lozano F; Varela-Centelles P; Seoane-Romero JM; Castelo-Baz P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Nov; 149(11):960-966. PubMed ID: 30219207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
    Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
    Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
    Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality, Readability, and Trends for Websites on Ankyloglossia.
    Aaronson NL; Castaño JE; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Jul; 127(7):439-444. PubMed ID: 29774762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.
    Parmar GS; Das S; Ingledew PA
    J Cancer Educ; 2023 Jun; 38(3):863-869. PubMed ID: 35854205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.