These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33226285)

  • 41. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
    Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 24953268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteoarthritis: An Objective Analysis With Historic Comparison.
    Murray KE; Murray TE; O'Rourke AC; Low C; Veale DJ
    Interact J Med Res; 2019 Sep; 8(3):e12855. PubMed ID: 31538953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Readability of postoperative discharge instructions is associated with complication rate in companion animals undergoing sterilisation.
    Biancaniello CM; Rolph KE; Cavanaugh SM; Karnik P; Peda A; Cavanaugh RP
    Vet Rec; 2024 Mar; 194(5):e3796. PubMed ID: 38321362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Readability Assessment of Internet-based Patient Education Materials Related to Treatment Options for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
    Sare A; Patel A; Kothari P; Kumar A; Patel N; Shukla PA
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Nov; 27(11):1549-1554. PubMed ID: 31926859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the Informational Content, Readability and Comprehensibility of Online Health Information on Monogenic Diabetes.
    Guan Y; Maloney KA; Roter DL; Pollin TI
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Jun; 27(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28951986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
    Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
    Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.
    Lee KC; Berg ET; Jazayeri HE; Chuang SK; Eisig SB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):180.e1-180.e8. PubMed ID: 30296407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
    Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
    Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
    Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing owners' readiness to change their behaviour to address their companion animal's obesity.
    Sutherland KA; Coe JB; O'Sullivan TL
    Vet Rec; 2023 Feb; 192(3):e1979. PubMed ID: 36073659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Survey of UK pet owners quantifying internal parasite infection risk and deworming recommendation implications.
    Pennelegion C; Drake J; Wiseman S; Wright I
    Parasit Vectors; 2020 Apr; 13(1):218. PubMed ID: 32336273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of websites that contain information relating to malaria in pregnancy.
    Hamwela V; Ahmed W; Bath PA
    Public Health; 2018 Apr; 157():50-52. PubMed ID: 29477789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others.
    Laplante-Lévesque A; Brännström KJ; Andersson G; Lunner T
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):618-26. PubMed ID: 22731921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
    McInnes N; Haglund BJ
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
    Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.