231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33226451)
1. Direct comparison of brain [
Wagatsuma K; Sakata M; Ishibashi K; Hirayama A; Kawakami H; Miwa K; Suzuki Y; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Nov; 7(1):70. PubMed ID: 33226451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between new-generation SiPM-based and conventional PMT-based TOF-PET/CT.
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Sakata M; Oda K; Ono H; Kameyama M; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():203-210. PubMed ID: 29173917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models.
Satoh Y; Hanaoka K; Ikegawa C; Imai M; Watanabe S; Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Onishi H; Ito T; Komoike Y; Ishii K
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative and Visual Assessments toward Potential Sub-mSv or Ultrafast FDG PET Using High-Sensitivity TOF PET in PET/MRI.
Behr SC; Bahroos E; Hawkins RA; Nardo L; Ravanfar V; Capbarat EV; Seo Y
Mol Imaging Biol; 2018 Jun; 20(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29192363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of physiological FDG uptake in small structures between silicon photomultiplier-based PET and conventional PET.
Watanabe S; Hirata K; Magota K; Takenaka J; Wakabayashi N; Shinyama D; Yasuda K; Homma A; Kudo K
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 37943379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating and comparing the image quality and quantification accuracy of SiPM-PET/CT and PMT-PET/CT.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Kato T; Baba S; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):725-735. PubMed ID: 32621167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of small-animal PET prototype using silicon photomultiplier (SiPM): initial results of phantom and animal imaging studies.
Kwon SI; Lee JS; Yoon HS; Ito M; Ko GB; Choi JY; Lee SH; Chan Song I; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Hong SJ
J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):572-9. PubMed ID: 21421723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of PMT-based TF64 and SiPM-based Vereos PET/CT systems for
Trotta N; Collette B; Mathey C; Vierasu I; Bucalau AM; Verset G; Moreno-Reyes R; Goldman S
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7567-7582. PubMed ID: 35894818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visualization of small brain nuclei with a high-spatial resolution, clinically available whole-body PET scanner.
Shinohara Y; Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 37989801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image Quality of Cardiac Silicon Photomultiplier PET/CT Using an Infant Phantom of Extremely Low Birth Weight.
Fukuchi K; Shibutani T; Terakawa Y; Nouno Y; Tateishi E; Onoguchi M; Tetsuya F
J Nucl Med Technol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38901966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High detection sensitivity and reliable morphological correlation of PET with a silicon photomultiplier for primary tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Kojima I; Takanami K; Ogawa T; Sakamoto M; Nagai H; Miyashita H; Iikubo M
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Sep; 34(9):643-652. PubMed ID: 32564300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of equivalent performance of 3D TOF [
Pilz J; Hehenwarter L; Zimmermann G; Rendl G; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Beheshti M; Pirich C
EJNMMI Res; 2021 May; 11(1):44. PubMed ID: 33934218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of Low-dose Whole-body FDG PET with SiPM-based PET/CT Scanner: Visual and Semi-quantitative Analyses Using Random Sampling from Full-dose Scan Data].
Inomata T; Sato K; Ibaraki M; Kominami M; Kinoshita F; Shinohara Y; Kato M; Kinoshita T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Oct; 79(10):1127-1135. PubMed ID: 37648506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of acquisition time and penalizing factor in a block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm on a Si-photomultiplier-based PET-CT system for
Trägårdh E; Minarik D; Almquist H; Bitzén U; Garpered S; Hvittfelt E; Olsson B; Oddstig J
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jul; 9(1):64. PubMed ID: 31342214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fully digital PET is unaffected by any deterioration in TOF resolution and TOF image quality in the wide range of routine PET count rates.
Salvadori J; Odille F; Karcher G; Marie PY; Imbert L
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jan; 8(1):1. PubMed ID: 33409746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
