These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33227179)

  • 1. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination.
    Ebeid K; Sabet A; Della Bona A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Sep; 33(6):844-848. PubMed ID: 33227179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral instruments on shade determination compared to visual shade selection.
    Ebeid K; Sabet A; El Sergany O; Della Bona A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Sep; 34(6):988-993. PubMed ID: 35142422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
    Czigola A; Róth I; Vitai V; Fehér D; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 34397163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of digital and visual tooth shade selection.
    Abu-Hossin S; Onbasi Y; Berger L; Troll F; Adler W; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2023 Apr; 9(2):368-374. PubMed ID: 36780185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of accuracy and characteristics of tooth-color matching by intraoral scanners based on Munsell color system: an in vivo study.
    Huang M; Ye H; Chen H; Zhou Y; Liu Y; Wang Y; Sun Y
    Odontology; 2022 Oct; 110(4):759-768. PubMed ID: 35212853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative in vivo study of new shade matching procedures.
    Hampé-Kautz V; Salehi A; Senger B; Etienne O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(4):317-323. PubMed ID: 33491927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracies of three intraoral scanners with regard to shade determination: An in vitro study.
    Huang M; Wang Y; Sun Y; Zhou Y; Liu Y; Ye H
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):111-117. PubMed ID: 35848886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination.
    Rutkūnas V; Dirsė J; Bilius V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):322-329. PubMed ID: 31227232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience.
    Yılmaz B; Irmak Ö; Yaman BC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Sep; 31(5):500-507. PubMed ID: 31228358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Intraoral Scanners in the Shade Matching Process: A Systematic Review.
    Akl MA; Mansour DE; Zheng F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 35919949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of intraoral spectrophotometers-Are there user-specific differences?
    Blum SL; Horn M; Olms C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Sep; 30(5):442-448. PubMed ID: 30144376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods.
    Mehl A; Bosch G; Fischer C; Ender A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):343-361. PubMed ID: 29292410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
    Tsiliagkou A; Diamantopoulou S; Papazoglou E; Kakaboura A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 26835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.
    Okubo SR; Kanawati A; Richards MW; Childress S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Dec; 80(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9830067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of conventional shade guides in teeth color determination.
    Todorović A; Todorović A; Gostović AS; Lazić V; Milicić B; Djurisić S
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Oct; 70(10):929-34. PubMed ID: 24313174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the ambient light illuminance conditions on the shade matching capabilities of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Methani MM; Özcan M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Sep; 33(6):906-912. PubMed ID: 32959520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of two clinical color measuring instruments for use in dental research.
    Akl MA; Sim CPC; Nunn ME; Zeng LL; Hamza TA; Wee AG
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104223. PubMed ID: 35839964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.