These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33228527)

  • 1. Mixed logistic regression in genome-wide association studies.
    Milet J; Courtin D; Garcia A; Perdry H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):536. PubMed ID: 33228527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control for Population Structure and Relatedness for Binary Traits in Genetic Association Studies via Logistic Mixed Models.
    Chen H; Wang C; Conomos MP; Stilp AM; Li Z; Sofer T; Szpiro AA; Chen W; Brehm JM; Celedón JC; Redline S; Papanicolaou GJ; Thornton TA; Laurie CC; Rice K; Lin X
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Apr; 98(4):653-66. PubMed ID: 27018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Principal component regression and linear mixed model in association analysis of structured samples: competitors or complements?
    Zhang Y; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25536929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies.
    Zhou W; Nielsen JB; Fritsche LG; Dey R; Gabrielsen ME; Wolford BN; LeFaive J; VandeHaar P; Gagliano SA; Gifford A; Bastarache LA; Wei WQ; Denny JC; Lin M; Hveem K; Kang HM; Abecasis GR; Willer CJ; Lee S
    Nat Genet; 2018 Sep; 50(9):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 30104761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Powerful and efficient SNP-set association tests across multiple phenotypes using GWAS summary data.
    Guo B; Wu B
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 35(8):1366-1372. PubMed ID: 30239606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies.
    Kang HM; Sul JH; Service SK; Zaitlen NA; Kong SY; Freimer NB; Sabatti C; Eskin E
    Nat Genet; 2010 Apr; 42(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 20208533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CERAMIC: Case-Control Association Testing in Samples with Related Individuals, Based on Retrospective Mixed Model Analysis with Adjustment for Covariates.
    Zhong S; Jiang D; McPeek MS
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1006329. PubMed ID: 27695091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel association test for multiple secondary phenotypes from a case-control GWAS.
    Ray D; Basu S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):413-426. PubMed ID: 28393390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrate multiple traits to detect novel trait-gene association using GWAS summary data with an adaptive test approach.
    Guo B; Wu B
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(13):2251-2257. PubMed ID: 30476000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous SNP selection and adjustment for population structure in high dimensional prediction models.
    Bhatnagar SR; Yang Y; Lu T; Schurr E; Loredo-Osti JC; Forest M; Oualkacha K; Greenwood CMT
    PLoS Genet; 2020 May; 16(5):e1008766. PubMed ID: 32365090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian multiple logistic regression for case-control GWAS.
    Banerjee S; Zeng L; Schunkert H; Söding J
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007856. PubMed ID: 30596640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient mixed model approach for large-scale genome-wide association studies of ordinal categorical phenotypes.
    Bi W; Zhou W; Dey R; Mukherjee B; Sampson JN; Lee S
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):825-839. PubMed ID: 33836139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
    Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling.
    Onifade M; Roy-Gagnon MH; Parent MÉ; Burkett KM
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 35120458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FastBiCmrMLM: a fast and powerful compressed variance component mixed logistic model for big genomic case-control genome-wide association study.
    Wang JT; Chang XY; Zhao Q; Zhang YM
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 May; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 38888457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for Population Structure in Gene-by-Environment Interactions in Genome-Wide Association Studies Using Mixed Models.
    Sul JH; Bilow M; Yang WY; Kostem E; Furlotte N; He D; Eskin E
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1005849. PubMed ID: 26943367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological implementation of mixed linear models in multi-locus genome-wide association studies.
    Wen YJ; Zhang H; Ni YL; Huang B; Zhang J; Feng JY; Wang SB; Dunwell JM; Zhang YM; Wu R
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Jul; 19(4):700-712. PubMed ID: 28158525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.
    Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA
    Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semiparametric Allelic Tests for Mapping Multiple Phenotypes: Binomial Regression and Mahalanobis Distance.
    Majumdar A; Witte JS; Ghosh S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 26493781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Software engineering the mixed model for genome-wide association studies on large samples.
    Zhang Z; Buckler ES; Casstevens TM; Bradbury PJ
    Brief Bioinform; 2009 Nov; 10(6):664-75. PubMed ID: 19933212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.