BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33228884)

  • 1. Safety and efficacy of 4% articaine in mandibular third-molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Santos-Sanz L; Toledano-Serrabona J; Gay-Escoda C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Dec; 151(12):912-923.e10. PubMed ID: 33228884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the Use of Articaine Increase the Risk of Hypesthesia in Lower Third Molar Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Filipe de Carvalho Nogueira E; Andrey da Costa Araújo F; Faro TF; de Albuquerque Cavalcanti Almeida R; José de Holanda Vasconcellos R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jan; 79(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 32976834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Articaine Provide an Advantage over Lidocaine in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Kung J; McDonagh M; Sedgley CM
    J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1784-94. PubMed ID: 26293174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anesthetic Efficiency of Articaine Versus Lidocaine in the Extraction of Lower Third Molars: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Zhang A; Tang H; Liu S; Ma C; Ma S; Zhao H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 30267700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis.
    Katyal V
    J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 20006669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
    Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
    Massignan C; Silveira Santos P; Cardoso M; Bolan M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 47(8):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 32383196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
    Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
    J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth.
    Robertson D; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; McCartney M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Aug; 138(8):1104-12. PubMed ID: 17670879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis.
    Brandt RG; Anderson PF; McDonald NJ; Sohn W; Peters MC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 May; 142(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 21531931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and Safety of Pulpal Anesthesia Strategies during Endodontic Treatment of Permanent Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Zanjir M; Lighvan NL; Yarascavitch C; Beyene J; Shah PS; Azarpazhooh A
    J Endod; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1435-1464.e10. PubMed ID: 31601433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Ahmed AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which is the most suitable local anaesthetic when inferior nerve blocks are used for impacted mandibular third molar extraction? A network meta-analysis.
    Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Sánchez-Torres A; Clé-Ovejero A; Coulthard P; Gay-Escoda C; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 49(11):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 32473767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Mittal J; Kaur G; Mann HS; Narang S; Kamra M; Kapoor S; Sindhi M; Kataria R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different anesthetics on the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: A network systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Larocca de Geus J; Nogueira da Costa JK; Wambier LM; Maran BM; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):87-97.e4. PubMed ID: 31813471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in a Primary Intraseptal Injection: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.
    Bonar T; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M
    Anesth Prog; 2017; 64(4):203-211. PubMed ID: 29200372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of articaine 4% versus lidocaine 2% in the local anesthesia of permanent mandibular first molars affected by MIH: a randomized controlled trial.
    Haidar M; Raslan N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2023 Oct; 24(5):621-630. PubMed ID: 37526883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.