207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33228884)
21. The efficacy of six local anesthetic formulations used for posterior mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia.
Abdulwahab M; Boynes S; Moore P; Seifikar S; Al-Jazzaf A; Alshuraidah A; Zovko J; Close J
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Aug; 140(8):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19654255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Buffered 4% Articaine as a Primary Buccal Infiltration of the Mandibular First Molar: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study.
Shurtz R; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M
J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1403-7. PubMed ID: 26095381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
Sierra Rebolledo A; Delgado Molina E; Berini Aytís L; Gay Escoda C
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anesthetic and analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine in mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bhattarai BP; Bijukchhe SM; Reduwan NH
Quintessence Int; 2020; 51(7):586-597. PubMed ID: 32500866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique.
Vishal G; Dandriyal R; Indra B N; Singh HP; Chaurasia A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 59(7):783-787. PubMed ID: 34301445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Rogers BS; Botero TM; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 24862701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Anesthetic Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine in Pediatric Patients During Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Taneja S; Singh A; Jain A
Pediatr Dent; 2020 Jul; 42(4):273-281. PubMed ID: 32847666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy and safety of articaine versus lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Su N; Li C; Wang H; Shen J; Liu W; Kou L
Aust Endod J; 2016 Apr; 42(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 27062318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adverse effects of articaine versus lidocaine in pediatric dentistry: a meta-analysis.
Li L; Sun DL
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):21-29. PubMed ID: 37997231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effectiveness of an additional lingual infiltration in the pulpal anesthesia of mandibular teeth: a systematic review.
Dou L; Luo J; Yang D; Wang Y
Quintessence Int; 2013 May; 44(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 23479588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is articaine more effective than lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis? An umbrella review.
Nagendrababu V; Duncan HF; Whitworth J; Nekoofar MH; Pulikkotil SJ; Veettil SK; Dummer PMH
Int Endod J; 2020 Feb; 53(2):200-213. PubMed ID: 31491042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Articaine versus Lidocaine in only buccal infiltration anesthesia for the extraction of mandibular anterior teeth. A prospective split-mouth randomized-controlled clinical study.
Al-Mahalawy H; El-Mahallawy Y; Abdelrahman HH; Refahee SM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):604. PubMed ID: 37641122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic.
Malamed SF; Gagnon S; Leblanc D
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 May; 131(5):635-42. PubMed ID: 10832257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of articaine infiltration and lidocaine blocking for microport extraction of impacted mandibular molar].
Huang YD; Xia H; Li XD; Yang XZ; Pei ZQ; Xia X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 29(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 21776852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: prospective, randomized crossover study.
Thakare A; Bhate K; Kathariya R
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2014 Jun; 52(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 25016509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of the ropivacaine infiltration in comparison with other dental anesthetics.
Figueroa-Fernández NP; Hernández-Miramontes YA; Alonso-Castro ÁJ; Isiordia-Espinoza MA
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6779-6790. PubMed ID: 33907893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
