These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33229649)
1. Simplifying and understanding various topographic indices for keratoconus using Scheimpflug based topographers. Doctor K; Vunnava KP; Shroff R; Kaweri L; Lalgudi VG; Gupta K; Kundu G Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 68(12):2732-2743. PubMed ID: 33229649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Keratoconus Screening Indices and Their Diagnostic Ability to Distinguish Normal From Ectatic Corneas. Shetty R; Rao H; Khamar P; Sainani K; Vunnava K; Jayadev C; Kaweri L Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 181():140-148. PubMed ID: 28687218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement between three different Scheimpflug systems in measuring corneal and anterior segment biometry. Hernández-Camarena JC; Chirinos-Saldaña P; Navas A; Ramirez-Miranda A; de la Mota A; Jimenez-Corona A; Graue-Hernindez EO J Refract Surg; 2014 Sep; 30(9):616-21. PubMed ID: 25250418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of Topographic Parameters Using Three Different Topographers in Keratoconic and Cross-linked Keratoconic Corneas. Chauhan P; Kamalakannan P; Upadhyay AD; Sinha R; Titiyal JS; Sharma N J Refract Surg; 2024 Apr; 40(4):e260-e269. PubMed ID: 38593263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness. Huang J; Ding X; Savini G; Pan C; Feng Y; Cheng D; Hua Y; Hu X; Wang Q Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):1951-8. PubMed ID: 23672973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of post crosslinking haze on the repeatability of Scheimpflug-based and slit-scanning imaging devices. Shetty R; Agrawal A; Deshmukh R; Kaweri L; Rao HL; Nagaraja H; Jayadev C Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 65(4):305-310. PubMed ID: 28513495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus by wavefront parameters using Scheimpflug, Placido and Hartmann-Shack based devices. Heidari Z; Mohammadpour M; Hashemi H; Jafarzadehpur E; Moghaddasi A; Yaseri M; Fotouhi A Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1659-1671. PubMed ID: 32219617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and agreement of three Scheimpflug-based imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in keratoconus. Shetty R; Arora V; Jayadev C; Nuijts RM; Kumar M; Puttaiah NK; Kummelil MK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jul; 55(8):5263-8. PubMed ID: 25074774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Angle Kappa agreement between Scheimpflug tomography, combined placido Scheimpflug and combined slit scanning placido systems. Awad-Allah MAA; Gharieb HM; Zaki RGE; Othman IS Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):381-386. PubMed ID: 35902424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying contact lens-related changes in keratoconus corneal topographic indices: an updated Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging analysis. Kasıkcı M; Karalezli A; Eroğul Ö; Gobeka HH Rom J Ophthalmol; 2022; 66(3):245-256. PubMed ID: 36349169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and reliability of ectasia display and topometric indices with the Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconic eyes. Kosekahya P; Koc M; Caglayan M; Kiziltoprak H; Atilgan CU; Yilmazbas P J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Jan; 44(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 29502620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of Keratoconus on Screening of Egyptian LASIK Candidates: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Abd-Elaziz K; Eissa S; Salah Y; Azzam S Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2022; 29(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 37123422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas With Keratoconus. Meyer JJ; Gokul A; Vellara HR; Prime Z; McGhee CN Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 175():122-128. PubMed ID: 27993593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes of corneal topography indices after CXL in progressive keratoconus assessed by Scheimpflug camera. Kránitz K; Kovács I; Miháltz K; Sándor GL; Juhász É; Gyenes A; Nagy ZZ J Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 30(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 24708090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Characterization of Subclinical Keratoconus Without Topographic or Tomographic Abnormalities. Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Azzolini C; Vinciguerra P J Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(6):399-407. PubMed ID: 28586501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]